ContentSquare Raises A $42M Series B To Democratize Data Analytics For Ecomm Brands

AdExchanger |

Paris-based ecommerce analytics platform ContentSquare has raised a $42 million Series B round from a series of investors including US VC firm Canaan and Highland Europe. ContentSquare previously had raised $20 million, bringing it to a total of $62 million after this round. The company will use the financing to support research and development ofContinue reading »

The post ContentSquare Raises A $42M Series B To Democratize Data Analytics For Ecomm Brands appeared first on AdExchanger.

Powered by WPeMatico

Genetic Engineering Unicorns & Designer Babies – Prof. Jennifer Doudna

Genetic Engineering Unicorns & Designer Babies - Prof. Jennifer Doudna
A gene editing technology called CRISPR could allow us to change DNA, not just in individuals, but in all their future children and grandchildren.

Jennifer Doudna is an American biochemist based at the University of California, Berkeley. Together with the French microbiologist Emmanuelle Charpentier, she led the discovery of the revolutionary gene-editing tool, CRISPR.

Jun 06, 2017
[Read More …]

Powered by WPeMatico

‘In one fell swoop:’ 75 percent of advertisers say they’ve been endangered by risky content

YouTube star Logan Paul. Pizza magnate John Schatter. Fox News provocateur Sean Hannity. Brands looking for safe harbor have had a tough time finding it in this multimedia landscape.

Most recently, YouTube put Paul’s Red projects on hold and axed him from its top-tier Google Preferred ad program after one of his videos featured the body of a man who committed suicide. No ads ran against the video, which got six million views before it was pulled from the platform, but YouTube’s action shows that it at least wants to be seen as taking brand safety—not to mention viewer safety—more seriously.

Brand safety, once shorthand for making sure your banner ad isn’t served alongside vulgar content, has become one of digital media’s most pressing issues. Brands are more concerned than ever with how they are perceived online, while platforms struggle with how to police user-generated content and digital publishers balance news coverage and advertiser interests.

“Of all the concerns within the digital media supply chain, brand safety may be the most pressing,” says Bob Liodice, chief executive officer of the ANA. Marketers spend years and millions of dollars building a reputation with its customers. “In one fell swoop, that reputation, that equity, that loyalty could be damaged or severely disrupted.”

To gain more insight into this matter, we partnered with Digiday Media to survey 300 industry executives about how brands, publishers, and platforms can mitigate their risks — and adequately deal with potential fall out.

To get the full results, download our report on brand safety, “The New Brand Safety Crisis.”

What we found: A brand safety crisis can have serious effects, but preventative measures are available.

If you’re a brand safety survivor, you’re not alone
According to our study, an alarming 75 percent of those surveyed reported at least one brand-unsafe exposure, any one of which could potentially lead to loss of revenue. Despite this high number, however, 15 percent of brands still do not use brand safety protection.

Brand risks are front page news
When asked about their biggest brand safety concerns, survey respondents named hate speech, pornography, and violence as prominent perceived risk factors. But when asked what hazards their brands have actually encountered recently, bad news and divisive politics were frequently mentioned.

 

You may experience brand confusion
When a brand has spent time and money building relationships with consumers who support and share their message, an incident of unfortunate association that opposes a brand’s moral alignment can be a devastating blow. Thirty-seven percent of marketers polled say that this has been a problem for their brands.

 

Prevention is possible
Savvy agencies and their brands use a combination of protective measures to prevent unwanted brand associations. 53 percent of brands surveyed use keyword detection to help mitigate risks, a method which allows advertisers to filter out content they don’t want to associate with at the category and article level.

But when it comes to image safety, fewer are employing the right tools. That number is staggering, considering the world is already awash in professional and user-generated images, far more than can be screened by an army of social media managers. AI-powered computer vision uses neural networks to screen millions of images for triggers like nudity, guns, crashes and swastikas.

Currently, just 15 percent of respondents reported using computer vision to scan before placement, while 11 percent said they employ it as corrective technology. Plenty of room for improvement here, especially considering that LDV Capital estimated by 2020 there will be an estimated 45 billion cameras in the world.

For the full results, download the GumGum report to learn:

  • How the issue of brand safety has evolved in recent years
  • Valuable insight from programmatic experts and advertisers
  • The most effective ways to protect your brand against a brand safety incident

The post ‘In one fell swoop:’ 75 percent of advertisers say they’ve been endangered by risky content appeared first on Digiday.

Powered by WPeMatico

What’s New For 2018? Nothing

AdExchanger |

“Brand Aware” explores the data-driven digital ad ecosystem from the marketer’s point of view. Today’s column is written by Belinda J. Smith, global director of media activation at Electronic Arts.  I realize I’m late to the game with the year-ahead predictions, but this year the annual ad tech soothsaying has hit a nerve. The slowContinue reading »

The post What’s New For 2018? Nothing appeared first on AdExchanger.

Powered by WPeMatico

Grading YouTube’s Latest Brand-Safety Safeguards

AdExchanger |

“On TV And Video” is a column exploring opportunities and challenges in advanced TV and video. Today’s column is written by Dominique Netto, head of client services at [m]PLATFORM – GroupM. After the brand-safety sagas of 2017, Alphabet appears to be using some of that $27.7 billion Q3 revenue to further develop brand safety across YouTube. ThereContinue reading »

The post Grading YouTube’s Latest Brand-Safety Safeguards appeared first on AdExchanger.

Powered by WPeMatico

Sir Martin In Davos; Amazon’s Ad Business In Context

AdExchanger |

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here. Swiss Cheddar Of the $50 billion or so WPP spent on media in the past year, about $5 billion went to Google and $2 billion to Facebook, according to CEO Martin Sorrell, speaking to Fox Business Network at the World Economic Forum in Davos,Continue reading »

The post Sir Martin In Davos; Amazon’s Ad Business In Context appeared first on AdExchanger.

Powered by WPeMatico

Digiday Research: Advertisers are divided over branded content efficacy

At the Digiday Marketing Summit in December, we sat down with over 30 industry executives from major brands across the country to discuss developing trends such as branded content. Check out our earlier research on brands’ social media spending here. Learn more about our upcoming events here.

Advertiser aren’t sure if branded content works
Brands are spending a lot of money on branded content — $10 billion in 2016, to be exact, according to Forrester’s most recent report. Given how much is being spent, marketers might expect branded content to perform exceptionally well, but that’s not necessarily the case. Respondents to Digiday’s survey were split on the effectiveness of branded content. Although no one thought branded content was completely useless, marketers we surveyed were just as likely to consider branded content incredibly effective or just somewhat effective.

This article is behind the Digiday+ paywall.

The post Digiday Research: Advertisers are divided over branded content efficacy appeared first on Digiday.

Powered by WPeMatico

Inside Jeffrey Katzenberg’s billion-dollar bet to crack the code on mobile video

Jeffrey Katzenberg is betting big on building a mobile video platform and business that others — from former Hulu CEO Jason Kilar to Verizon — haven’t been able to figure out.

Since last year, the former DreamWorks Animation CEO has been making the rounds in Hollywood and at big industry events to pitch an ambitious new project, the mobile video-focused holding company WndrCo. Among other things, WndrCo is building a global video platform for short- and mid-form content, which would be anchored by shows from some of the top Hollywood talent at production levels to rival HBO and Netflix.

On Jan. 24, the Beverly Hills-based WndrCo announced former HP CEO Meg Whitman as the CEO and first employee of what it’s referring to as its “New TV” venture, which doesn’t have an official name or product yet but will be a subscription-based app developed in-house by the company. Whitman will hire a team for New TV as the venture also raises funds to get the product off the ground, said sources with knowledge of the company’s plans. Whitman’s long track record in building and running major tech companies including eBay and HP will ideally complement Katzenberg’s background in content, these sources said.

It’s not clear how much Katzenberg and Whitman are looking to raise specifically for New TV, but in public comments that Katzenberg made last year, he said he was looking to raise $2 billion for all WndrCo. Since then, WndrCo has raised $595 million, and, more recently, Katzenberg has been telling industry executives that he’s now only looking to raise about $1 billion, according to Recode. Internally at WndrCo, the expectation is still that New TV will require several billions of dollars worth of investments over the coming few years, sources said.

There’s skepticism among entertainment and tech insiders about the feasibility of a premium video platform for short- and mid-form content. Others including Verizon’s Go90 and Kilar’s Vessel have tried it, only to fail.

Katzenberg’s pitch, according to multiple sources inside or who have recently met with WndrCo, is that previous attempts didn’t go far and big enough — to the point that he doesn’t even see New TV and previous mobile video platforms as worthy of comparison, sources said. Katzenberg’s pitch is that Go90, Facebook Watch and Vessel tried to create more polished versions of YouTube, where New TV is focused on building primetime TV-quality shows that are delivered in episodes that run for 10 minutes or less.

At the core of the New TV content strategy will be these tentpole shows, which are internally being called “Mini-Series,” sources said. A typical Mini-Series will have a total running time anywhere between 120 minutes and 240 minutes, but broken into 8- to 10-minute chapters for distribution on the New TV platform, according to WndrCo sources. New TV is targeting shows with budgets as high as $100,000 to $150,000 per minute, sources said. For comparison’s sake, a lot of the programming seen on Go90 and Facebook Watch these days costs roughly $20,000-per-minute or less. (In talking about his New TV ambitions at Cannes last year, Katzenberg cited how shows on HBO and Netflix had budgets in the range of $200,000 to $300,000 per minute.)

The kind of resources that have existed in the two-hour format and the one-hour format, [Katzenberg and New TV want] to bring it to this new form of storytelling,” said a source with direct knowledge of WndrCo’s plans.

As WndrCo and New TV raise money, a significant portion of the funds will also be set aside for marketing these high-profile projects, an area which sources said Go90 and Verizon have been lacking.

Katzenberg’s track record ensures he will be able to raise a healthy amount of capital and generate interest among big media companies and A-list talent to develop shows for the platform. Recently, Katzenberg has been pitching a model similar to Hulu, in which media giants such as Disney, Fox and Viacom would invest in New TV while also providing original content for the platform, according to Recode.

There’s no doubt among industry insiders that Katzenberg, Whitman and company will be able to get big partners on board and that the content that ultimately shows up on New TV will be high-quality.

New TV hasn’t bought any projects yet but has about a dozen or so ideas it’s mulling over and has met well over 200 TV showrunners across both scripted and unscripted programming since last year, said a source. Last year, during Cannes, Katzenberg also said he’s met with big-name talents such as J.J. Abrams, Ron Howard and Jerry Bruckheimer.

Ultimately, the question is whether that’s enough to convince people to download and pay for a new app. People already can watch cheaper short- and mid-form shows on YouTube and Facebook, and they already have Netflix, Hulu, Amazon and HBO for long-form, expensive fare. Is there a market for the middle — a product that attempts to combine the two?

Ever the persuasive pitchman, Katzenberg is confident that he can convert even a percentage of people that have now grown accustomed to watching a ton of short-form videos every day, sources said. As the argument goes, if people are willing to pay Spotify for something they can easily get for free, a similar market can develop for short-form videos — if done right.

“I don’t know if there’s a market — everyone that has tried it has failed,” said a Hollywood agent. “You could argue that [Go90, Vessel and others] just didn’t spend enough money, and maybe that’s why it’s taking time for WndrCo and New TV to build up a fund because they’re going to need to raise a substantial amount.”

In the past year, the market for high-end, short-form video shows has dried up. Platforms such as Spotify and Comcast’s Watchable have either stopped funding original digital shows or ceased operations entirely. Go90 is rethinking its content strategy. Facebook bought a ton of short-form shows during its initial round for Watch, but it’s now, along with YouTube, leaning toward longer-form, TV-quality fare.

While the big-budget fare will be core to the New TV product, Katzenberg and co. are not ruling out lighter, episodic fare in areas such as music, news, lifestyle and entertainment to round out the mobile app, sources said. In this context, New TV could be the next big hope for digital video makers looking for a place to sell shows to — even if some digital producers have grown weary of companies trying to build a consumer platform for short- and mid-form video.

“I’ve just seen too many of these things with huge fanfare come and go,” said one veteran digital producer. “Katzenberg is a real one, but even so … It will just slip away into the night.”

“No one is baking into their financial plan just yet that they’re going to be getting money from a WndrCo deal in a way that they are right now with Facebook Watch,” added a media executive that’s sold shows to Facebook and has met with WndrCo. “But without knowing what it looks like just yet, having [Katzenberg] as a potential partner certainly makes me optimistic.”

WndrCo, meanwhile, has already signaled its interest in working with digital media creators by making some small investments in digital media companies including Clique Media Group, The Young Turks Network and Whistle Sports.

“It’s Jeffrey Katzenberg,” said an executive at a company that took an investment from WndrCo. “There are guys you just don’t bet against.”

For more on all things video, subscribe to Digiday’s new weekly video briefing, written by Sahil Patel.

The post Inside Jeffrey Katzenberg’s billion-dollar bet to crack the code on mobile video appeared first on Digiday.

Powered by WPeMatico

Amazon is targeting Google search budgets

Google is known for dominating search marketing, but Amazon is giving Google a run for the ad revenue thanks to the rapid growth of Amazon Marketing Services, Amazon’s search marketing platform.

Media buyers said the e-commerce conglomerate has improved AMS over the past six months. While many brands are still learning marketing on Amazon, they are already sold by the performance of its search ad products, and Amazon is also pushing advertisers to spend more on AMS, according to agency executives.

AMS offers three ad formats: Sponsored product ads that feature a “sponsored” label in search results, headline search ads that show up as the very first sponsored result beneath the search bar and product display ads that could appear in the right-hand rail on a category page or on a product detail page below the “Add to Cart” button. From October to December of last year, ad spend on sponsored product ads and headline search ads gained quarter-over-quarter increases of 64 percent and 75 percent, respectively, compared to 37 percent on Google Shopping, according to Merkle’s marketing report released on Jan. 25. The report is based on ad spend by over 100 brands in the U.S., and Merkle declined to provide the baseline number of those percentages.

“Amazon’s ad growth is stronger than Google’s because lots of ad formats on Amazon are fairly new to brands,” said Andy Taylor, associate director of research for Merkle. “But overall, ad investment on Google is much stronger than on Amazon.”

It may be normal for brands to advertise more through search marketing on Amazon during the holiday season, but five agency executives interviewed for this story said they saw an uptick in ad spend on AMS in general. A New York-based agency executive who prefers anonymity thinks it took a while for many brands to fully understand and trust Amazon, but after 2017, many have bought into the performance that Amazon delivers. “Brands are increasing their Amazon spend as a whole, rather than reallocating from other [ad] placements,” said this New York executive. “The ROAS [return on ad spend] [of AMS] is often higher than other search engines, due to how far down the funnel the searches are.”

Jacob Davis, vp and head of audience planning for iCrossing, also said most of his clients’ spend on Amazon is on search products, although his team continuously evaluates other ad opportunities on Amazon.

Sponsored product ads seem to be Amazon advertisers’ primary focus at the moment. This ad format accounted for 85 percent of all ad spend on AMS, followed by headline search ads (11 percent) and product display ads (4 percent), according to Merkle’s marketing report. Meanwhile, a Seattle-based executive said that on average, his clients spend 60 to 75 percent of their Amazon marketing budgets on sponsored product ads.

“With sponsored product ads, we can do keyword-based targeting and see the highest return,” said Danielle Waller, manager of SEM for Merkle. “There are more complexities going into headline search ads. For instance, you need to have high enough click-through-rate, otherwise Amazon will [stop running] your headline search ads. From an ad performance perspective, there’s no strict rule about sponsored product ads.”

James Thomson, partner of Amazon consultancy Buy Box Experts, agreed that sponsored product ads represent a majority of clients’ ad spend because they are straightforward and easy to set up. But another big reason why sponsored product ads have gotten so many ad dollars is because the format is also available to third-party vendors that usually don’t have access to headline search ads or product display ads.

“AMS requires a vendor account, so it is an ad platform for first-party vendors — third-party vendors can’t access AMS,” said Thomson. “But Amazon now offers vendors in the third-party marketplace a sponsored ad tool that is similar to sponsored product ads under AMS. Sponsored product ads for first-party and third-party look the same to shoppers, and they take the same ad space.”

Thomson also thinks sponsored product ads are near the bottom of the sales funnel, while headline search ads are used to improve brand awareness. Different from sponsored product ads that direct shoppers to a product detail page, headline search ads direct Amazon users to a merchant’s customized “store” page, where shoppers can see different products that the merchant is offering, according to Thomson. “You also need to be a big company to afford top-of-the-funnel advertising like headline search ads,” he said. “Some headline search ads cost $49 per click, compared to a few cents per click [of some sponsored product ads].”

No matter what ad format an advertiser plans to spend more on, ad investment in AMS will continue to grow. On one hand, Amazon is pushing media buyers to spend more on search by doing more follow-up than usual, as well as highlighting growth opportunities and optimization techniques to improve performance; on the other hand, agencies and clients themselves are driving the growth, according to Davis.

“As people are becoming more comfortable in the space and Amazon is making it easier for advertisers to spend, the results have improved, which leads to more investment,” he said.

Joe Migliozzi, lead for Mindshare’s commerce division Shop+ in North America, agreed that Amazon has been investing more resources into educating agencies and improving its advertising platform. “If we had the same search conversation a year ago, AMS was not this user friendly to media buyers,” said Migliozzi.

This year, Amazon seems like it’s planning to expand AMS to third-party vendors. On Jan. 25, the e-commerce giant’s in-house media agency, Amazon Media Group, sent Thomson a message that said: “Our charter this year is to focus on launching third-party brand [owner] sellers from search to display advertising — for a number of reasons.”

For more on everything Amazon, subscribe to our weekly Amazon Briefing email newsletter. 

The post Amazon is targeting Google search budgets appeared first on Digiday.

Powered by WPeMatico