The state of brands taking marketing in-house, in 5 charts

Marketers are starting to question the decisions agencies have made on their behalf. Consequently, marketers of the likes of Procter & Gamble, Unilever and Royal Bank of Scotland believe they should be the ones, not agencies, to make decisions about how their budgets are spent. It has meant more marketers are trying to control more of what they spend on programmatic advertising, and there are signs that they want to create more ads themselves.

Here are five charts that show why advertisers are in-housing their marketing and what skills they’re prioritizing.

Brands are clueless about media’s effectiveness
A study released in March by media consultancy Ebiquity on behalf of Radiocentre, the marketing body for commercial radio, backs Wheldon’s comments. The report, which surveyed 116 senior marketers working for brands and agencies, found that marketers consistently overvalue online media channels while undervaluing the traditional ones.

Source: Ebiquity and Radiocentre

Advertisers aren’t cutting agencies entirely
In a survey of 149 marketers by the Association of National Advertisers late last year, more than a third (35 percent) said they had reduced the work they brief to agencies after they had bolstered their own in-house programmatic expertise. Like Pritchard, those marketers want to run the strategy for programmatic campaigns, leaving their agencies to manage them by performing tasks such as post-campaign reporting.

Source: Association of National Advertisers

Data has increased importance
In China, P&G is using one of the country’s largest data-management platforms alongside its own proprietary measurement system to do better propensity modeling and frequency capping on more nuanced audience segments. According to brand chief Marc Pritchard, the setup slashed P&G’s waste online by 30 percent last year and increased reach by 65 percent. Other advertisers like RBS, Jaguar Land Rover and Pernod Ricard are realizing they need to leverage their own data wisely if they’re to properly take ownership of their marketing. An Ascend2 study of 233 marketing professionals conducted in January found that most are prioritizing data management this year.

Source: Ascend2

Advertisers face competition for talent
It’s easy for an advertiser to talk on a stage about taking control from agencies. It’s harder to find people who can do that and have a direct impact on the business. Agencies, on the other hand, can offer talent jobs across multiple clients and at a scale that many brands can’t. Advertisers acknowledge the talent challenge and have made recruitment and internal development a priority in 2018. A study released last month by the World Federation of Advertisers found that nearly half (46 percent) of the 28 advertisers surveyed that spend over $50 billion (£36 billion) globally on marketing have made strengthening their own programmatic skills a priority over the next year.

Source: World Federation of Advertisers

Brands are producing creative in-house
In its annual report, Unilever said its in-house teams are creating content faster and around 30 percent cheaper than external agencies. Like other big brands, Unilever thinks it can save considerably by in-housing more of the production of its ads and reducing the number of agencies it works with. Three, Lucozade, RBS and others are trying to replicate Unilever’s efforts, attempting to create more of their ads internally. These advertisers aren’t alone, according to a global study of 4,198 marketing professionals by Adobe and Econsultancy that found that more advertisers plan on bringing content production in-house in 2018.

Source: Adobe and Econsultancy

The post The state of brands taking marketing in-house, in 5 charts appeared first on Digiday.

Powered by WPeMatico

Open look: Athlete-driven media companies have the attention of fans and advertisers

It’s Jan. 14, the night before the final regular-season game between the Golden State Warriors and the Cleveland Cavaliers, and Kevin Durant and LeBron James are sitting in the back of an Uber — a Cadillac Escalade, to be specific — in Akron, Ohio. But instead of talking trash while riding through the falling snow, the two rivals are discussing President Donald Trump.

“Our team, as a country, is not ran by a great coach,” Durant says.

This article is behind the Digiday+ paywall.

The post Open look: Athlete-driven media companies have the attention of fans and advertisers appeared first on Digiday.

Powered by WPeMatico

‘We need real diversity’: Hearst’s Joanna Coles says more women in leadership will lead to culture change

This article is a free preview of the new issue of Digiday magazine, our quarterly print publication that’s distributed to Digiday+ members. To find out more about Digiday+ — and to subscribe — please visit the Digiday+ section.

Joanna Coles, chief content officer at Hearst Magazines, argues that print is having a moment, with former advertisers coming back, and makes the case that Snapchat is a healthier social network than others. Here’s our conversation, lightly edited.

Hearst seems to be more bullish on — and do better at — magazines than other big magazine companies. Why is that?
We love print. I’m a huge believer in it. We’ve lived with devices long enough to understand their enormous advantages and disadvantages. If you’ve spent 90 minutes scrolling on your phone, you don’t necessarily feel more informed. You may feel listless and restless. We’re moving into a post-digital euphoria. We’ve seen e-books have plateaued, and real books have had an enormous rebirth. A magazine is restorative. You need to be able to unplug. You absorb information differently when you read it on the page.

How many magazines is Hearst going to launch this year?
We’re probably going to launch two or four in the second half of this year. Two, definitely.

Magazines have had more of an advertising challenge than a reader challenge. Is there any sign that’s changing?
For certain advertisers, the metrics that some of the digital companies give allow them to be really specifically targeting when they want to move product urgently. But if you want to establish trust with your customer, a magazine is unbeatable. We are hearing from advertisers who pulled out from print who are coming back. We offer incredible value for money; the ad is seamless in the consumer experience. You can’t unsee an ad in a magazine. And it’s high-quality content. It’s real; it’s not bullshit.

How’s the approach to launching a magazine different today than before?
All our successful partnerships — Oprah, The Pioneer Woman — we launched with existing media partners. We’re now launching with digital partners who have enormous consumer audience and no longer want to be a pure digital play, understand the value of having a physical manifestation of their brand. No digital company now wants to be purely digital. They want to use it as a totem of being a member of a tribe. If you carry Airbnb, if you have a copy of Harvard Business Review or The Economist, it says something about the nature of who you are.

Hearst’s approach to magazines has changed. You’ve taken the approach of having, say, one beauty editor for multiple titles. How has that changed things, and what have the challenges been?
I had argued for a long time that it made absolutely no sense for the same company to be sending eight different beauty editors from eight separate titles in eight separate cabs to the opening of the same mascara and writing eight stories. It’s not a great use of resources. We were competing against each other with our company’s money. It’s been super reinvigorating. A lot of staffers have been excited to work on different brands. As a result, we have better differentiated content. Now, you can have one person writing three points of view. With the eight, you’d be getting the same story.

Hearst decided to separate print and web, while some publishers still believe integration is the way to go. What’s the case for that?

Here’s how I think of it. I’m the coach for the American Olympics team. My goal is to bring back as many gold medals as I can. The team for running the marathon is focused on different things than the team running the 100-meter sprint. You would never expect one person to be able to do every sport. It’s just not practical to expect people to be able to do everything all the time.

It seems like we’re in the backlash phase of #MeToo. Do you worry there won’t be lasting change coming out of it?
I think the only permanent change that’ll come about is if we have real diversity in the leadership of companies and government. I’m working as hard as I can to ensure that comes to pass for the next generation. There’s no tipping point till you reach 30 percent on boards and senior management. One of my goals is to look for the best possible female and diverse talent and give it the most support I can.

Do you find it hard to be optimistic?
I don’t think it’s hard to be optimistic. I think Trump was a wild-card candidate. I would be astonished if the Democrats didn’t take the House back. And I think millennials will put down their phones and get to the polls because they weren’t energized for either candidate [in 2016].

How do you think your membership on the board of Snap has helped Hearst?
It’s certainly helped my understanding of how a tech company works. It’s been integral to how Cosmo’s developed awareness [on Discover]. We now have seven Hearst brands on Snap, so we’re the publisher that’s the most represented.

You have long-standing experience in news and magazines. What impact do you hope to have there with that experience?
One of the reasons I was so engaged with the Discover platform was Evan Spiegel’s really prescient understanding that the web was full of crap, and human editors were increasingly important in a world that relied on algorithms. He completely foresaw fake news and wanted to build a platform with reputable media brands. He reads an enormous amount.

How aligned are Discover publishers and Snap?
I think all our goals are aligned, especially in light of what’s happened to Facebook. We want to make sure we are an easily available route to high-quality journalism.

Thanks so much for talking with me.
I hope you’ll mention my book. It’s called “Love Rules: How to Find a Real Relationship in a Digital World.” It’s really about how, in this particular moment, the importance of actual relationships, communicating face to face, is really important. We’re at the point now where people who have a real-life social network will live longer than the people who don’t. We understand the nature of electronic media can be addictive.

How does that square with your involvement with Snapchat?
The biggest indicator of whether you’ll use Snapchat is you have one true friend. There’s no like button — the goal is to keep you connected with your actual friends. So not all social networks are created equal.

The post ‘We need real diversity’: Hearst’s Joanna Coles says more women in leadership will lead to culture change appeared first on Digiday.

Powered by WPeMatico

String Theories: Snopes For Dopes

There are no superheroes in real life, and the best we’ve got for watchmen in the war on so-called “fake news” is Snopes. People still seem to believe in Snopes. I have no idea why.

Powered by WPeMatico

Why Brands Must Form an Identity to Retain Customers in the Voice Economy

Not so long ago, we’d only initiate a conversation with a brand if something had gone wrong, but we’re now starting to use conversation to do much more: to explore options, to make purchases and even to investigate medical issues. Whether it’s in the form of instant messaging or voice-user interfaces, conversation is becoming an…

Powered by WPeMatico

4 Steps for Effectively Managing a PR Crisis

The best way to survive a brand crisis is to start planning before the crisis hits. Get your plans in order Each crisis may come as a surprise, but your response should not be. Smart organizations have a crisis management plan in place that involves every aspect of the organization–including HR, legal and technical. “Ninety-five…

Powered by WPeMatico

Editor’s Letter: Brands Face Challenges Relating to Consumers and Avoiding Missteps

When it happens, it moves so fast that your initial feeling is disorientation. That quickly flips to nausea, fear and then panic. I’m of course talking about a brand crisis unfolding before the world, supercharged by social media and shared and commented on into oblivion. You’ve been dragged. It’s a tough position for both individuals…

Powered by WPeMatico

Can American Idol’s Return Hit the Right Notes for ABC?

ABC’s surprise revival of American Idol, which had ended its run on Fox in 2016 after 15 seasons, dominated last May’s broadcast upfront week. While ABC touted the pickup as a great fit for its network, its rivals publicly questioned the economics of the move. “The price is so expensive, you need a 35 share…

Powered by WPeMatico

How to Survive a Public Brand Scandal and Recover Customers’ Trust

It was a chicken joke of epic proportions, but it took a while for the punch line to land. For nearly two weeks last month, nearly 900 KFC franchises in the U.K. were unable to obtain fresh chicken parts thanks to a cock-up with the company’s new delivery firm. KFC U.K. needed to acknowledge the…

Powered by WPeMatico

A Look at the Future of 5G-Powered Smart Cities

What will cities of the near future look like when buildings, cars, people and a whole slew of other things can communicate with each other? Earlier this month, tech companies and telecoms at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona, Spain, tried to answer that question, showing off their plans for 5G–a next-generation wireless network that will…

Powered by WPeMatico