GDPR: Leveling The Playing Field Or Flattening Publishers?

“The Sell Sider” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community. Today’s column is written by Ivan Ivanov, chief operating officer at PubGalaxy. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has positive intentions, aimed primarily at controlling the data practices of large corporations. Many hoped the regulation would begin to level theContinue reading »

The post GDPR: Leveling The Playing Field Or Flattening Publishers? appeared first on AdExchanger.

Powered by WPeMatico

Comic: In The Publisher’s Kitchen

A weekly comic strip from AdExchanger that highlights the digital advertising ecosystem… AdExchanger: Origins AdExchanger: Crisis In Ad City (Part I) AdExchanger: Crisis In Ad City (Part II) AdExchanger: Enter Malware (Part I) AdExchanger: Enter Malware (Part II) AdExchanger: Enter Malware (Part III) AdExchanger: Enter Malware (The Conclusion) AdExchanger: Angels And Startups AdExchanger: Rumble In Arbitrage PlazaContinue reading »

The post Comic: In The Publisher’s Kitchen appeared first on AdExchanger.

Powered by WPeMatico

Amazon SoHo Store To Feature Local Trending Products; Feds Eye Agency Rebates

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here. Brick By Brick Amazon’s newest foray into offline retail is a store called Amazon 4-star in New York City’s SoHo neighborhood featuring products that have high ratings and are trending with New Yorkers. The store will be similar to Amazon’s small chain of bookstores,Continue reading »

The post Amazon SoHo Store To Feature Local Trending Products; Feds Eye Agency Rebates appeared first on AdExchanger.

Powered by WPeMatico

Bloomberg Media is using text-to-audio to keep app users engaged

Bloomberg Media in May introduced a text-to-audio function in its app and online with the hunch that commuters would prefer to multitask while getting their news.

According to Julia Beizer, global chief product officer, adoption started off slow, particularly on mobile web, and shortly after launch, people were listening to two and a half stories on average per app session. Now, this has increased to six stories and has become the second-most popular media type on the app (behind live TV).

“Audio is particularly interesting for our audience because of that multitasking utility, that is a real news use case,” said Beizer. “The delivery of journalism is changing to meet this moment, audio for a multitasking audience a huge tool in our toolkit.”

Publishers like the Financial Times, which has a similar audience segment of global business decision makers, has been converting text to audio articles since last year and is seeing that people are coming back regularly to listen.

Audio fits into the product team’s wider goals of driving utility for the Bloomberg audience, particularly a younger audience. According to Beizer, the Bloomberg audience age is varied, skewing younger than expected in areas. For the Markets area of the site, for instance, 48 percent of the audience is under 35 years old.

Studies show that podcast listeners tend to be younger: Research from U.K. radio trade body Radio Joint Audience Research in March found that two-thirds of new podcast listeners are aged between 16 and 35. And new users are growing: 21 percent of podcast listeners have started listening in the last six months.

Bloomberg has taken advantage of the renaissance in podcasting. The company said that audience downloads for its some 25 podcast have increased 35 percent year over year, but was unwilling to give exact numbers.

Bloomberg broadcasts a number of different podcast formats. One of the most recently launched, TicToc, an extension of its Twitter show, details daily news. This summer Bloomberg ran its first mini-series podcast with The Pay Check, a six-episode series looking at the gender pay gap through sociological, financial and personal lenses. Since its launch in May, the podcast has had 200,000 downloads. The success of this, said Beizer, is encouraging Bloomberg to create more mini-series this year, including one on the new economy covering the challenges facing the world economy, and one on navigating the productivity industry.

Bloomberg was early in on developing skills for Amazon audio focused Echo devices and has two to three people who work getting content like its Market Minute on other smart speakers like the Apple HomePod, Echo and Home.

But the scale isn’t there on smart speakers for Bloomberg to create platform-specific content. Bloomberg’s Twitter show, TicToc, is distributed on Amazon’s Echo Show, which features a screen, is performing well, according to Beizer, because both social-created content and Echo Show content are experienced with the sound off.

“The rise of smart speakers is particularly remarkable in an era when every one of us would rather get a text message than talk on the phone,” she said.

Image: courtesy of Bloomberg Media. 

The post Bloomberg Media is using text-to-audio to keep app users engaged appeared first on Digiday.

Powered by WPeMatico

Dotdash, nearing $100m in revenue, takes a scrappy approach to video

For many big publishers, for better or for worse, video has become core to their growth plans. But Dotdash, the service and lifestyle publisher that used to be About.com, is largely sticking to its text-based roots and skipping the often expensive pivot to video that others have taken.

Dotdash is on track to grow revenue 50 percent this year to more than $100 million, CEO Neil Vogel said. But video isn’t central to its approach. It only runs video on 1 percent of its articles, and while other publishers are betting on long-form series that will be picked up by the Hulus and Netflixes of the world, Dotdash is taking a scrappy, lo-fi approach.

Dotdash has a 10-person video team, along with freelancers, that can crank out as many as 100 cooking videos in a day. Most are how-tos, running one to two minutes long that cost as little as $50 for fitness gifs, like this one, to $1,000 for one requiring an expert like a plumber. Sometimes even vp of video Heather Menicucci herself does the voice-overs.

“If your costs are under $500 per video and you can monetize it through the viewer, that’s one thing,” said Bernard Gershon, president of GershonMedia, which consults to publishers on video. “Otherwise, you have to find other places to distribute to.”

The videos themselves hew to the formats typically found in how-to and service videos. The recipe videos are hands-in-pans style, like this one for a giant ice cream sandwich. Videos are only served inside their corresponding article, though, rather than being targeted widely to maximize views.

The conservative approach to distribution is a change from Dotdash’s previous life as About.com, when it would make generic, autoplayed videos and drop them in the middle of a page where visitors would be forced to see them. After it unbundled About.com into five verticals including Verywell, The Spruce and The Balance, with an emphasis on fewer ads and a clean user experience, Dotdash revised its video approach accordingly, moving to click-to-play videos without pre-roll and using them to supplement its articles. A recipe article will embed a video of the dish being prepared, for example.

A few are monetized with product placement or outstream ads, but there are no plans to run pre-roll, and most aren’t long enough to justify mid-roll ads. Dotdash can afford to eschew most video ads because it’s profitable and has a corporate parent (IAC) that’s patient.

“We did everything wrong before,” Vogel said. “We made a decision based on revenue, and everybody hated it. We’re a place where people come to get answers. The better we serve those people, the longer they’ll stay.”

Since Dotdash isn’t concerned with maximizing video ad revenue, it pays closest attention to play rate and completion rate. The company said completion rates vary from 70 percent to 30 percent depending on the topic, and are substantially better than what they used to be when it was running autoplay, without giving specifics. To get completion rates up, the company looks at things like format and placement. People didn’t like video on top of the screen, so they all run inside articles. “We’re being much more thoughtful about where to put video in the article,” said Menicucci.

Because it’s not trying to maximize video ad revenue, Dotdash runs only a small number of videos off platform, on Facebook, which it treats as an awareness-builder. Most publishers make very little of their digital revenue from platforms anyway. The most lucrative platform overall has been YouTube, but even there, Dotdash doesn’t see a business case, since YouTube optimizes for watch time and Dotdash’s videos are designed for one-and-done viewing.

“It is a different ecosystem, and you do have to invest in it,” Menicucci said. “So it’s not as easy as taking our video and throwing it on YouTube.”

Dotdash is, however, looking at Instagram as a potential outlet for video and is starting to think about Snap. It’s also thinking about making personality-driven videos of the type that YouTube likes. But again, it’s treating those as brand-building forums, not money-makers. “We want to build a suite of content around home stuff, and that’s where that personality comes into play,” Menicucci said.

The post Dotdash, nearing $100m in revenue, takes a scrappy approach to video appeared first on Digiday.

Powered by WPeMatico

The Digiday dictionary: Deconstructing media and marketing’s buzzwords

This article appears in the latest issue of Digiday magazine, a quarterly publication that is part of Digiday+. Members of Digiday+ get access to exclusive content, original research and member events throughout the year. Learn more here.

Meaningless jargon and lazy buzzwords have plagued the media and marketing industries for decades, and the problem only seems to be getting worse. With that in mind, we’re releasing the third edition of the Digiday Dictionary. Whether you’re trying to baffle someone into buying something they don’t need, decipher something your vendor told you, or simply cover up for having no idea what you’re talking about*, this guide will have you covered. (*Actual results may vary)

Ad exchange: Cheap ad space

Ads.txt: List of people we think we can trust

Agency of record: Scapegoat

Brand newsroom: Marketers with journalism degrees

Brand safety: Screenshots

Branded content: Native advertising that’s more expensive

Consent management platform: Something we say we use so we don’t get fined

Consultancies: Agencies with suits

Consumers: People

Data: Email addresses

Digital agency: Website sweatshop

Display: Banners

Engagement: Likes

Facebook Watch: Animal videos

GDPR: We’ve updated our privacy policy

In-house: Dedicated agency group

Long-form: 15 minutes, tops

Native advertising: Branded content

Pivot: Desperation

Podcast ad measurement: Discount codes

Premium video: Netflix

Privacy: An illusion

Publisher commerce: Amazon links

Social agency: Tweet sweatshop

Sponsored content: Text ad

Subscriptions: Last resort

Transparency: Insertion orders

Video audience measurement: A tax a publisher pays to take meetings with TV ad buyers

View views: Autoplay

Viewability: Bigger ads

The post The Digiday dictionary: Deconstructing media and marketing’s buzzwords appeared first on Digiday.

Powered by WPeMatico

Facebook and Google do not have to worry about regulation any time soon

Back in April, Mark Zuckerberg traded his customary T-shirt for a suit and faced the Senate’s Commerce and Judiciary committees to testify about how Facebook became breeding grounds for Russian disinformation and interference with the 2016 presidential election. He faced a phalanx of cameras, and more importantly, 46 Senate members.

The hearings descended into farce at times, with senators glowing in the presence of the tech titan, telling corny jokes and asking for favors.

This article is behind the Digiday+ paywall.

The post Facebook and Google do not have to worry about regulation any time soon appeared first on Digiday.

Powered by WPeMatico

As advertisers take more control of ad tech, SSPs are in the firing line

More advertisers are re-evaluating how they use demand-side platforms, putting the supply-side platforms they buy ads from in the firing line.

The more advertisers learn about how their DSPs buy programmatic ads, the more they’re asking their agencies why they pay SSPs to handle those deals if it’s possible to buy directly from publishers. The tech tax is eating more of the advertiser’s budget, and while that was acceptable when programmatic spend was relatively low, it’s not now.

This article is behind the Digiday+ paywall.

The post As advertisers take more control of ad tech, SSPs are in the firing line appeared first on Digiday.

Powered by WPeMatico

Confessions of a young female ad agency staffer: ‘My hope for change is slim’

While the #MeToo movement has certainly brought issues around sexual harassment and sexism to light in the workplace, ad agencies are still in the early stages of figuring out how to respond. In the latest in our Confessions series, in which we exchange anonymity for candor, a young female ad agency staffer in her 20s discusses how sexism is still prevalent in the industry.

Answers have been edited for length and clarity.

The #MeToo movement has opened the dialogue around sexual harassment and sexism in the workplace. Do you feel like the advertising industry is still a boys club?
Men are favored so much in this industry. I think the #MeToo movement really only affected women. Men, I feel like, have already forgot. I still hear male co-workers being gross. When the Aziz Ansari thing came out, a male co-worker said loudly in a meeting: “I guess assault means nothing anymore.” And he wasn’t being ironic or funny. I told him to be quiet.

What are some examples of sexism you see playing out today?
I see it even when it comes to being listened to. The media team might come over and ask me and my female colleagues a question, but they won’t believe our answers. They’ll ask us to ask the men we work with and then believe whatever they say. Men are also still getting paid more. I asked my male counterpart who does exactly the same job I do what he makes, and it turns out he makes $5,000 more than me. And I’ve heard from other people that the guy who’s associate manager, who doesn’t do more work than me but has a higher job title, makes $17,000 more than me.

You have also been a victim of sexual harassment while working at an agency. Can you describe what happened?
About a year ago, at my old agency, there were three guys and myself on our team. It was a total boys club. I felt uncomfortable a lot. This one guy in particular often made wildly inappropriate sex jokes. At a lunch one day, they were playing a game where they were naming a celebrity they wanted to have sex with and rhyming their name with a person at work they wanted to have sex with. One of the guys named me and I got pissed, and then they continued to tease me about it. I chose to go to HR to file a sexual harassment complaint.

What then?
The agency called a lawyer in, and it wasn’t handled well. The lawyer ended up calling some of my colleagues, basically trying to get dirt on me. No change was made, but the agency mysteriously laid me off a few months later. I think it’s because of the complaint I made.

Did you take any further action against the agency?
No, because the day after I was laid off, I was hired at my current agency — total fate right there, I couldn’t have been luckier — and didn’t have the time or money to pursue a company that big.

Do you believe sexist attitudes in the workplace perpetuate a culture where sexual harassment is OK?
Definitely. If it’s believed women are less, then they will be treated as less. At my old agency, one of the guys tried to write me up for saying “fuck” even though they had filthy mouths. That was sexist AF. That attitude led to worse behavior.

What can women in advertising do if they work at an agency with a culture like you describe?
Women can help each other by standing up for each other when they hear bullshit. I think the most learning needs to be done by men. I don’t think we need to be responsible for their toxic environment.

Will change come?
My hope for change is slim. Change will come when guys who claim to have been disgusted by what happened turn to guys saying something shitty by the water cooler and say “knock it off” instead of saying nothing.

The post Confessions of a young female ad agency staffer: ‘My hope for change is slim’ appeared first on Digiday.

Powered by WPeMatico

In push to become retailers, fashion brands undergoing internal overhauls

Fashion brands can’t just be brands; they have to be retailers. Brands up and down the fashion ladder, from Michael Kors to Milly, from Alice + Olivia to Theory, from Acne to Vince, from Burberry to Gucci, are focusing business efforts not on their wholesale partners but on direct retail channels. On their e-commerce sites and in their own stores, they control the product arrangement, the merchandising, the pace of inventory drops, the shipping times and fees, the return policies, the product recommendations and the look and feel.

It’s not a vanity exercise. With wholesale channels tapped out, it’s where there’s still room for growth.

“The reason why we’ve developed a bigger direct-to-consumer business is because it’s critical today to have a customer understand you, inside and out,” said Theory CEO Andrew Rosen. “We’re putting a lot more focus on our customer now, because to understand them means to serve them better, which needs to grow. We simply can’t do that in the same way with outside retailers, whether it’s Saks or Neiman or Bergdorf.”

When it comes to marketing, it’s not even enough for brands to act like retailers.

“Brands today are like media companies,” said Alice + Olivia CEO and creative director Stacey Bendet. “Ten or 15 years ago it was really just about making great clothes. Today it is about telling a story, reaching your customer and engaging that customer in more dynamic ways.”

The shift to DTC isn’t just about the Warby Parkers, Everlanes and Caspers of the world. To survive, brands seeing the majority of their revenue driven from wholesale retail need to go direct. According to a February IAB report, industry growth is being fueled by direct sales: In 1992, physical retailers accounted for 96 percent of sales for the $2 trillion retail industry. Today, non-store retailers (so, direct sellers and e-commerce brands) account for 9.4 percent of the $5.3 trillion retail industry.

“You can no longer avoid direct communication and touch points with your customers, and if you’re a native wholesale brand, that often means rebuilding your enterprise from the ground up,” said Jeremy Bergstein, CEO and president at The Science Project, a retail agency working with brands like Nike, Veronica Beard and 7 For All Mankind on their direct selling strategies.

Re-righting a business to prioritize a direct customer relationship — not one filtered by the eye of department store buyers — doesn’t happen overnight. Far from it: To maneuver the shift, these brands are overhauling internal organizations, hiring new positions and making up titles, building data sets, and doing more marketing legwork on the same budgets.

A lot is happening under the hood.

Flipping 80-20
Brands have been building up retail logistics for years, but DTC brands have lit a fire under the transition.

“This is now growing quickly for brands, because it has to. But it’s a pretty transformative effort,” said Steve Dennis, analyst at SageBerry Consulting. “They have to build out the capabilities that the retailers they’re now competing with have: Pick, pack and ship fulfillments, data tracking, supply chain logistics. It’s a big effort, and culturally, it’s a different business.”

At Milly, a 19-year-old fashion brand led by creative director Michelle Smith and CEO Andy Oshrin, it’s been an ongoing effort to strike a more equal balance between sales generated from wholesale partners and from direct channels. Historically, sales have been mostly through wholesale, at 80 percent, while 20 percent came from e-commerce and in-store sales.

The goal is, over the next few years, to shift that to a 50-50 split or, at least, 60-40. To do so, Milly has added a collection within its runway line that is targeting millennials with a lower price point and isn’t sold through any retailers.

“It’s not easy. From an organizational perspective, it causes a bit of an upheaval,” said Oshrin. “But we don’t really have a choice. It’s a reaction to who’s shopping where. If you’re not growing, you’re dying.”

Oshrin said it’s not about giving up on department stores, but introducing a new product tier with a new customer in mind that isn’t filtered through the lens of the buyer. To do that, the brand’s design and marketing teams have had to follow alongside customer data trends to stay focused on the different vision. The brand hasn’t hired more people to take on specialized jobs; rather, everyone’s work has become more diversified.

Milly’s not the only brand reworking internal departments and their functions in order to develop its direct-to-consumer business. At Theory, its DTC Theory 2.0 line was conceived, designed and marketed by a team of Theory employees across departments including e-commerce, IT and audience development. “The world moves at a much faster pace, and we have the ability now unlike any other time in our history to communicate directly to our customers. But that can only happen if our company isn’t siloed,” said Rosen.

Still, Rosen said the DTC brand is made more powerful thanks to his ability to unite the team by sharing his vision. At Vince, creative director Caroline Belhumeur has done a similar unification across e-commerce, wholesale and in-store channels, by bringing all of those departments under her and connecting them with the brand’s unified message so it’s more cohesive to the consumer.

The new middlemen
Democratic unification is often easier said than done.

“The persistent problem here is attribution,” said Richie Siegel, the founder of consumer advisory firm Loose Threads. “Departments that need to be working together find themselves competing against each other to own a sale. But if a customer sees something in Nordstrom, goes online, puts it in their shopping cart, but then stops in the store to buy it, who owns that sale?”

Oftentimes, as brands transition from wholesale-dependent to partially direct companies, intermediary roles arise. Chief digital officers and chief information officers become momentary middlemen, shuttled in to smoothe over relationships between tech team’s data sets and marketers, wholesale and e-commerce. Ralph Lauren hired a chief digital officer earlier this year to increase all digital sales, both owned and third-party, as well as rethink digital marketing strategies.

“The title can change, but really, this person becomes the facilitator between the art and science of the business,” said Bergstein. “The CTO has the data and doesn’t know what to do with it. The CMO is in touch with the gut feeling behind a brand, but they can no longer work in a way that hovers over the customer. They have to be responsive. But marrying those two gets difficult.”

But a chief digital officer is more like a symbol. Ultimately, sparking a strategic overhaul falls under the job description of a CEO.

“We don’t have pockets of politics, we’re working toward the same goal,” said Oshrin, who added that as long as the data is supporting the trend the brand is working toward — like the fact that e-commerce is up 80 percent year-over-year — that’s enough.

The end goal — unless you’re Gucci — isn’t to cut off wholesale partners at the knees. For brands moving direct, the idea is that an overall stronger brand with loyal customers will result in a lift for everyone.

“This isn’t the death of wholesale. That’s an exaggeration,” said Siegel. “This is just retail getting better, across the board.”

The post In push to become retailers, fashion brands undergoing internal overhauls appeared first on Digiday.

Powered by WPeMatico