Cannabis and the workplace: The pandemic has bosses and employees craving its benefits

The use of cannabis has blossomed during the pandemic — including among many professionals who, while working from home, have made the consumption of products like cannabis-infused beverages and edibles, as well as marijuana, a bigger part of their routines.

The Los Angeles-based marketing firm Material, whose clients include Amazon and Coca-Cola, sought to determine whether the habits of cannabis-consuming professionals during the pandemic mirrored those of cannabis users overall. In a survey of 450 individuals in corporate management positions, 46% said they increased their consumption since working from home became the norm amid the pandemic. Of those, 61% said they didn’t consider it a permanent change and intended to return to their normal usage levels post-pandemic.

And the firm found that a large majority are open about their cannabis consumption: 73% said they were comfortable talking about it with coworkers, while 58% said they wouldn’t mind talking about it to their bosses or clients.  

Cannabis had already achieved wider acceptance even before the pandemic. But over the past year, to cope with life in these challenging times, more consumers have turned to it for its wellness benefits. 

As before Covid, people are embracing cannabis for reasons that vary from improving their mental health, stoking productivity and creativity, and enhancing the quality of their sleep to simply alleviating boredom. 

Even an icon of domesticity and propriety, Martha Stewart, an outspoken proponent of cannabis, got in the game, partnering with Canopy Growth to lend her brand name to a line of CBD products (for humans and for pets) that launched during the pandemic. 

As such products have gone mainstream, one of Stewart’s main constituencies — working mothers — are among the groups embracing cannabis. San Francisco-based research firm Lucky Analytics, whose clients include L’Oréal and Hewlett-Packard, found in a survey of 1,000 women in the U.S. that two in five now use cannabis-based products. The trend is especially prevalent with working moms, “who have been put in the spotlight over the past year with tremendous, increased pressures, both in their careers and home lives,” said Dorren Bloch, the company’s founder and CEO.

The growing popularity of cannabis during Covid doesn’t come as a surprise to people like Roy Lipski, a biotech entrepreneur and cofounder and CEO of San Diego-based Creo, which, with its partner Genomatica, develops fermentation-based cannabinoid production technologies. “Modern life has thrown our systems off balance, leading to allergies, anxiety, depression, sleeplessness,” said Lipski. “In the pandemic, those situations have been exacerbated, and cannabinoids have the potential to affect many health benefits.”

If Lipski’s company has its way, cannabis-infused products will become more accessible. The company is working to reform the cannabinoid supply chain to meet the rigorous standards of major CPG marketers, which has the potential to take these products to the aisles of every supermarket where legal.

Whether that includes the workplace remains to be seen.

While cannabis has largely moved out of the shadows, it is not without controversy in the working world. After all, this is a substance that, even though legalization has grown, is still banned in many places, and forbidden by many employers.

“What employees do in their own time is their business, but intoxicants have no place in the workplace,” said Matt Erhard, managing partner of the Canadian recruitment firm Summit Search Group. “Recruiters interact with lots of candidates and need to have a clear head, good memory and strong focus to do their job correctly. All of these are impaired by cannabis.”

Erhard draws a distinction between THC, the mind-altering ingredient in cannabis, and CBD, the non-psychoactive element that’s used in everything from face creams and lattes to those Martha Stewart gummies. Erhard said his company has a strict policy forbidding the use of alcohol and other drugs during the workday — something that was put in place pre-pandemic and will continue after the return to the office.

Cannabis usage by employees during the pandemic has been of minimal concern to Eric Fischgrund, founder and CEO of the New York PR firm FischTank. If one of his people uses it “to foster creativity, sharpen focus or is just looking to maintain a certain mind-state, then bravo for them for finding a solution that works,” he said. But once the office opens back up, the use of cannabis may well become an issue if it happens in front of other employees or becomes a distraction to the business, he added. 

Even cannabis-related businesses have strict rules about partaking in the office. 

Despite the personal freedoms the pandemic and remote working have ushered in, “we all need to be mindful of how our actions may affect others on the team,” said Seth Richtsmeier, associate director of SEO at Cannabis Creative Group, a Boston-based marketing firm, which bars drug use during the workday. “Let’s save consumption for when we’re clocked out, so to speak.”

3 Questions with Rebecca Rowntree, freelance creative director and host of ‘This Way Up’ podcast

Several reports have highlighted that the pandemic has stunted the progress women had made in the workplace and widened the gender pay gap, what’s your view on that? 
I’m so angry and fed up that we keep seeing the same headlines about the gender pay gap. Some of the findings show that the pandemic has made things 10 times worse [for] us in terms of the gender pay gap. One study said it would take 141 years to close it. That women in their 30s will never see equal pay in their lifetime. That’s really shocked me. I want to try and elevate women’s career stories on my platform which is why I started “This Way Up.”

How much harder will it be for women coming back to roles after the pandemic?
Even if things go back to normal, there is a damaging effect on confidence, or people may not take up the same role again. Or they may not go for a role that they actually could do. I have seen that time and again: women just settling for less because it is easier. It’s really about institutions, and sometimes men, not doing enough to recognize the problem — to acknowledge the different needs women have in order to have a proper career. A lot of men subconsciously think they would rather have a man in a certain position because then they know they won’t be taken away by childcare issues. But that is extremely damaging for them in [the] future as they are not getting that diversity of minds in the workplace.

You’ve written a manifesto “We Are Not A Stereotype” featuring prominent women from the design and creative industry. What’s its message? 
Our stories are very specific to us so it’s very hard for women to group together under one umbrella apart from the word “pay gap.” Throughout my career [at agencies] I never had a female creative director above me. The micro aggressions and continuous put-downs — you don’t realize what they are, you think it’s normal. But it’s been detrimental to my confidence and creativity. It took a lot of personal work to rebuild that, as well as having to fight for equal pay. The manifesto is a rallying cry for women to open up about the struggles they’ve faced in their careers to create awareness that each person’s challenge is unique and to show other women at all stages of their career that others have come through the same challenges. There is much more understanding about the importance of flexibility at work as a result of the pandemic too, so it’s not all doom and gloom.

Numbers don’t lie

What else we’ve covered

  • FoW managing editor Jessica Davies reports that families have been under acute pressure to meet work and financial commitments while also homeschooling their kids through various rolling lockdowns over the last year. Meanwhile, kids have suffered their own anxieties and mental health issues as a result of the pandemic. To address this, agencies have invested extensively in mental health and wellbeing support programs.
  • Pitch theater has long been a fundamental part of how agencies woo prospective clients. But as regular contributor Tony Case reports, the pandemic soon put an end to that as all travel was suspended and in-person meetings blocked. Nevertheless, agencies have come up with interesting new ways to be as effective with their pitches in a virtual environment. We took a look at what agencies expect pitches to look like through 2021 and beyond.
  • Some agencies have begun to experiment with their promotion and career path development structures to cultivate and retain talent — a move they see important if they’re to attract and retain the best talent in a more distributed working world. Others have gone a step further and removed all line managers so they can shift away from legacy hierarchal structures.
  • As regular contributor Steve Hemsley reports the move to remote working has made it more difficult to promote company culture. It is harder to remind long-term workers what the organization stands for and why there are certain ways of doing things. We take a look at how companies like L’Oréal are tackling it.
  • Senior news editor Seb Joseph spoke with one Black senior marketer who lamented that their company always seems to have money in the budget to provide fodder for company holidays, such as flags, but not a specific budget for Black History month.

A good read

  • As marketing reporter Kimeko McCoy found, a year into the pandemic lockdown, the lines in housework and gender roles have become glaring and women in the advertising and marketing industries are struggling to strike a balance. Since the beginning of the pandemic, diversity and inclusion has taken on a new meaning as Black and brown employees, women and other marginalized communities continue to ask for not just equality, but equity. But are those calls going unanswered?

This newsletter is edited by Jessica Davies, managing editor, Future of Work.

The post Cannabis and the workplace: The pandemic has bosses and employees craving its benefits appeared first on Digiday.

‘They’re solving a problem’: The Washington Post readies its Zeus platform for the buy side

After spending much of last year building one side of its advertising marketplace, Zeus, the Washington Post is gearing up to open the other. 

In the beginning of the second quarter, Zeus Prime, a self-service ad platform, will be opened up so ad buyers can reach users across all of the sites using Zeus Performance, the header bidding wrapper plus ad rendering engine that the Post announced in 2019 before opening up to all comers in January 2020; the Post has spent the past half year testing Zeus Performance on its own site inventory, running more than 100 campaigns for some 50 different brands.

Zeus Prime is entering an increasingly crowded field, with publishers ranging from Vox Media to Forbes to BuzzFeed standing up solutions built on first-party data. But with brands and agencies figuring out new ad spending strategies ahead of the loss of third-party cookies, the Post is betting that Zeus Prime, along with the help of a contextual targeting engine called Zeus Insights, can help prove out a thesis that many smaller publishers have long been hoping buyers will consider: That fast-loading ads, delivered with contextual targeting in a high-quality environment, can drive results. 

“We believe that the Zeus network is differentiated enough because of the marketplace [and] the targeting,“ said Jarrod Dicker, vp of commercial technology and development at the Washington Post. “Our intent is to try and lean as heavily [into], and prove as much as possible, that context and consumption is going to be performant.” 

The Post decided it needed scale before it could approach brands and agencies, so it spent close to a year adding publishers and their ad inventory, starting with Arc client the Dallas Morning News before expanding beyond Arc customers. (Though both are owned by the Post, Arc and Zeus are treated as separate products that operate under separate balance sheets.)

Over the past year, Zeus has added “about 150” publisher websites, Dicker said, including those owned by McClatchy, MediaNews Group and Tribune Publishing. The Post is looking to add sites that fit outside the news category and is in active discussions with several lifestyle publishers, Dicker said, though he declined to name them. 

Zeus currently offers more than 4 billion impressions per month across its participants’ owned-and-operated sites, a number that goes up when one includes their inventory in places like Apple News, which buyers can also target. 

While publishers are free to connect Zeus Performance to any number of SSPs, Dicker said he expects that demand for Zeus Prime’s network will fare well against competition: Dicker predicts those impressions will command CPMs north of $6 (the Post takes a percentage on every campaign sold through Zeus Prime).  

For buyers, Zeus Prime is designed to encourage testing. Thanks to a partnership with Polar, for example, which built an ad-buying interface that allows ad buyers to repurpose existing social media ad campaigns, an ad buyer can simply enter the URL of an existing Facebook ad, set some targeting parameters, enter credit card information, and launch an ad campaign immediately. 

Ads are targeted using contextual parameters, with a shared taxonomy across all Zeus Performance participants.  

“They’re really delivering on this very well,” said Chad Stoller, UM Worldwide’s global chief innovation officer. “The fact that they’re able to make publishers competitive on viewability and all these other standards is impressive.” 

“Take a step back and consider why there are so many people on this platform,” Stoller added. 

“It’s because they’re solving a problem.”

The post ‘They’re solving a problem’: The Washington Post readies its Zeus platform for the buy side appeared first on Digiday.

How publishers are maximizing retention after the COVID-19 subscription surge

Michael D. Silberman, senior vice president of strategy, Piano

For many publishers, 2020 was a good year for subscriptions, and the trend has continued into 2021. For example, over the last month, The New York Times grew active news subscriptions by 48%, and Insider has doubled its subscriber base to just over 100,000 in the previous year. At Piano, our data shows even higher growth — a median increase in active subscribers of nearly 58% from the end of 2019 to the end of 2020. Much of that growth was driven by increased demand for news during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Coming out of this pandemic subscription surge, many publishers are focusing more on retention. Our data shows a boost in median retention rates in annual and monthly subscriptions acquired during the pandemic. And so, moving into 2021, what tactics should publishers focus on to maximize retention and minimize churn?

Use pricing to shift toward annual subscriptions

Subscribers behave very differently with monthly auto-renewing subscriptions as compared to annual models. The obvious difference is that monthly subscribers have 12 chances to cancel and stop paying over the course of a year, while annual subscribers typically have only one. The result, in most cases, is that monthly subscriptions have a much lower retention rate by the end of 12 months and, therefore, lower subscriber lifetime value. Comparing performance over the first year of a subscription, at the median, only 45% of monthly subscribers are left at the end of that year, while 75% of annual subscribers remain.

To illustrate the impact of that retention difference, say a company offers a typical media subscription with a price of $9.99 monthly and $99.99 annual. Annual is offered at a 17% discount compared with monthly. In theory, the company could make more money off the monthly subscribers, but the lower monthly retention cancels out that price difference. In fact, at the end of three years, each annual subscriber is worth 60% more revenue than a monthly subscriber — about $82 more per subscriber. That is why it often makes sense to price annual at an even steeper discount, perhaps 30%, to encourage more users to sign up for annual subscriptions instead of monthly. That lower price will pay off in higher long-term revenue with lower churn.

Use trials carefully to reduce early churn

Trials have a significant impact on retention. Non-trial monthly subscriptions have a median retention of 86% from the first month to the second. Even at a relatively low price, such as $1, paid trials retain 81% when the trial period is over. But free trials retain only 70% when users have to start paying, with a significantly lower lifetime value as a result. Looking again at one-year retention for monthly subscriptions with free trials, only 25% are left at the end of the year. This is in contrast to the 45% retained for non-trial subscribers and 41% for paid trials.

Adopt an onboarding program

Churn rate is highest in the first month — 80% of it is caused by users who make a specific decision to cancel, which is called active churn. This happens most often when users turn off auto-renew and allow their subscription to lapse when the renewal comes up. The higher risk of cancellation within the first few months is why it is beneficial to have onboarding campaigns that introduce users to the benefits of the subscription and encourage early usage and engagement. If companies can retain users until the third month, churn risk drops substantially. Users who have made multiple full-price payments are more likely to continue to subscribe.

There are a variety of tactics to engage users early in their subscriptions. Successful approaches include:

  • Sending an email from the top editor, welcoming new subscribers, thanking them for their subscription and telling them about the benefits of being a subscriber. 
  • Signing up users for a personalized or subscriber-only email immediately following conversion as part of the checkout process.
  • Encouraging users to download a mobile app — if the company has one — to target them via email or directly on their mobile device as they browse the website.
  • Survey users after a few weeks to collect feedback and remind them about the benefits of their subscription.

Target high-risk users with rescue tactics

As the above tactics come into play, it’s important to keep an eye on elements of the subscriber base that pose more risk than others in the area of retention. To help identify them, there are three buckets of users who typically churn that publishers should consider:

  • Sleepers are customers with active subscriptions who have not visited the site in the past 30 days. Our recent research shows that 60% percent lose interest within the first two months. Conventional wisdom says do not try to bring them back immediately because they are at high risk of canceling when they finally visit. Saving a reactivation campaign for times of increased news demand could reduce that risk.
  • Passive churners most likely did not intend to cancel and instead just neglected to update their payment information. Use proactive tactics like credit card retries — automatically trying a failed charge again — or reminding users to update their credit card before expiration. If they do churn passively, they are more likely to resubscribe. 
  • Fast churners have turned off auto-renew early. Use on-site messaging or email campaigns with special offers to win back these subscribers.

These are just a few of the tactics that are successful for increasing retention but, no matter what you try, it can create a sizable payback. Because of the value of retention over time, for every 1% reduction in churn, there is a corresponding 13% increase in three-year subscription revenue. That is an improvement that really pays off over time.

The post How publishers are maximizing retention after the COVID-19 subscription surge appeared first on Digiday.

Adweek Podcast: International Women’s Day

On this International Women’s Day themed episode of ‘Yeah, That’s Probably an Ad,’ host Ko Im is joined by guest co-host Nicole Ortiz, Community Content Manager Luz Corona, and Senior News Writer Katie Lundstrom to discuss International Women’s Day through the lens of marketing. Stream the new episode below, listen and subscribe on Apple Podcasts…

When It Comes to Clean Beauty, Miranda Kerr’s Kora Organics Stands Purposely Apart

Growing up in the small town of Gunnedah in rural New South Wales, Australia, Miranda Kerr was steeped in homeopathic remedies and natural foods from an early age. Her grandfather tended an organic vegetable garden, and her grandmother reached for herbs and superfruits to soothe a variety of ailments. But when her mother was diagnosed…

Turning the CMO Moves Tables on Nadine Dietz

This episode marks a first for CMO Moves. We turned the tables on host Nadine Dietz as she joins as a guest for the very first time. CMOs Vineet Mehra and Musa Tariq take the hosting reigns to put Nadine in the hot seat to dish on the new adventure she’s taking on, as well…