Cheat sheet: Where Scroll fits in Twitter’s subscription plans
Twitter is slowly assembling a media ecosystem for media elites where very little media appears to be for sale.
Twitter today announced it had acquired Scroll, the long-gestating subscription service that offers an ad-free browsing experience across a network of hundreds of blue chip publishers, including Vox Media, Insider and The Atlantic.
The key details:
- Twitter plans to fold Scroll’s core feature — an ad-free, fast experience on web pages — into Twitter
- Twitter is pulling Scroll off the market, temporarily — the latter service will stop adding new customers and will revert back to a private beta. Twitter is also shutting down Nuzzel, a kind of curation element Scroll acquired
- Twitter sees the experience as part of a growing list of features that will be offered as part of a subscription, price TBD (Scroll cost $4.99 per month)
- Terms of the deal were not disclosed; Scroll had raised a total of $10 million in venture capital, according to Crunchbase
A ‘high bar’ to clear
Twitter has been signaling its plans to develop a subscription product — sometimes unintentionally — for over a year. Going back to 2020, ideas that were thrown around included paid access to TweetDeck, or the ability to edit tweets.
Those ideas were met with skepticism, both on Twitter and off. “We have a really high bar for when we would ask consumers to pay for aspects of Twitter,” Twitter CFO Ned Segal told analysts last summer.
What’s emerged over the past few months looks more like infrastructure for an entirely separate content experience on Twitter’s platform. In January, Twitter announced it had acquired newsletter publishing platform Revue, saying it would explore ways to tie newsletters and Twitter more tightly together for creators.
Earlier this week, Twitter announced that the hosts of Spaces, Twitter’s Clubhouse knockoff live audio feature, would be able to charge for admission to live conversations.
Tuesday’s announcement adds to this momentum, offering the prospect of a kind of premium content flywheel: a experience of web content, on and off Twitter, leads to Twitter subscribers spending more time consuming quality content, which in turn leads to them sharing more of said content on Twitter, and discussing it using a broadening set of features, some of which might also be exclusive to subscribers.
Or, as Scroll founder Tony Haile put it in a blog post, “a great gathering of people who love the news and pay to sustainably support it.”
Two different internets?
Tantalizing as this might sound to well-heeled media junkies, it could trigger alarms elsewhere. As interest in subscription revenue has taken off, filtering down to individual Substacks and even co-ops, a chorus of people has warned that this stratification of media — premium information for those who can pay, clickbait for those who cannot — augurs badly not just for media, but for society in general.
That might be a bit of an over-simplification, but this acquisition could put have a powerful effect on the bottom lines of many publishers. Twitter announced today that it would help grow the number of publishers participating in Scroll, right at a moment when many of them are preparing for a significant disruption to their ad businesses with the pending exit of the third-party cookie.
Even without that disruption, Scroll had some good selling points — a source at one publisher using Scroll told Digiday last week that, on a per-user basis, revenue from Scroll is “multiples” higher than the revenue generated by advertising.
The post Cheat sheet: Where Scroll fits in Twitter’s subscription plans appeared first on Digiday.
IAB: Average CTV Advertiser Spending Surged 22% In 2020
advertising decision-makers” (both advertisers and agencies) surveyed by Advertiser Perceptions for the Interactive Advertising Bureau.
Pearls Before Swine by Stephan Pastis for Tue, 04 May 2021
Programmatic Guaranteed: From Academic Possibility To The Upfronts Marquee
This article is sponsored by Xandr. As upfronts season approaches, programmatic guaranteed promises to play a major role in the conversation in ways never thought possible a few years ago. While once considered a pipe dream, programmatic technology has evolved, garnering the ability to instill full confidence in highly predictable delivery among all marketplace participants.… Continue reading »
The post Programmatic Guaranteed: From Academic Possibility To The Upfronts Marquee appeared first on AdExchanger.
‘Drowning’ In Sorrow: Another Day, Another Tragic TV Drama
60% Of School Apps Are Improperly Sharing Student Data With Third Parties
The kids are online, but their data is not all right. The majority of school utility apps used by kids and parents are pervasively sharing student data with third parties through advertising and analytics software development kits (SDKs), including those provided for free by Google and Facebook. On average, school apps have more than 10… Continue reading »
The post 60% Of School Apps Are Improperly Sharing Student Data With Third Parties appeared first on AdExchanger.
Programmatic, Meet CTV: Ad Tech’s Latest Gold Rush
Digital ad tech companies are making their play to control advertising on CTV. But it’s not easy to become a star of the big screen. Ad tech companies that make it big in CTV must earn their spot in a few ways. First, they must understand the supply constraints of CTV and find their niche.… Continue reading »
The post Programmatic, Meet CTV: Ad Tech’s Latest Gold Rush appeared first on AdExchanger.
Mobile Ad Blocking On The Rise; Meredith Sells Its Local TV Stations For $2.7 Billion
Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here. Chocka-ad-blocker While everyone is freaking about the phaseout of third parties cookies and low IDFA opt-in rates, don’t forget – an estimated 40% of US adults already block online ads on PCs or phones. According to new data from Blockthrough reported by CNET, ad blocking… Continue reading »
The post Mobile Ad Blocking On The Rise; Meredith Sells Its Local TV Stations For $2.7 Billion appeared first on AdExchanger.
How the Try Guys took their YouTube channel and turned it into a media company and a TV deal
The Try Guys brand was formed in 2014 by four BuzzFeed producers who wanted to be funny on their company’s YouTube channel.
Within four years, the group — Ned Fulmer, Keith Habersburger, Zach Kornfeld and Eugene Lee Yang — realized the brand had enough of a fanbase to buy the rights from BuzzFeed and set out on their own.
Now the Try Guys’ company, 2nd Try, has a staff of nearly two dozen, a YouTube channel with more than 7.5 million subscribers, numerous product lines (including hot sauces, teas and a cookbook), a movie, and an upcoming special on the Food Network, all of which have come to fruition since 2018.
In the fourth and final episode of the Digiday Podcast’s creator series, Fulmer, Habersberger and Kornfeld talk about how passion is key to growing their company earnestly and organically and how being independently owned allows each other the flexibility for experimentation.
Here are a few highlights from the conversation, which have been lightly edited for length and clarity.
Friendships over fandoms sell products
I think what’s very cool about making content on the internet is that we are unlike traditional celebrities, like actors, in that we are mostly just being us all the time. As a viewer, it’s more of a friendship than it is just a fandom. The lines between them bleed. And we saw that when we did things, people would do them too. [Such as] watching me eat everything from a fast-food restaurant, and then going and buying that food and that fast food restaurant.
How could we make [our product lines] even more attached to us so rather than just them going to Taco Bell and getting something I recommended, what if I could design a sauce and a flavor profile that I could describe and then someone could actually go get it. And now I’m in their cabinet. — Habersberger
Expanding the Try Guys universe
We did not set out to become YouTubers, we set out to make great stuff and happened to find a home on YouTube. Part of our future is realizing the tremendous opportunity we have on that platform, but also continuing to strive to try and push that platform to a new place and find opportunities outside it and beyond it because frankly, I still really yearn to make things in a more traditional sense. I know all of us do in different ways. Like I would love to see more scripted content from the Try Guys universe, I would love the chance to make more long-form storytelling. Some of that stuff we can do on YouTube, some of that stuff we can’t. And we’re excited for all the opportunities we have because of the fan base. — Kornfeld
Pivot to television
Before our pilot for Food Network, I was a little nervous because it was the first time we’d ever made a TV show and for the last decade of my career, I’ve been like, “I want to I want to make TV.” Then I arrived on set and everything is the same stuff I do every single day. It was the basically the exact same type of situation we have when we shoot our “Without A Recipe” [series] on [our YouTube] channel, except it was in a restaurant on location and they had slightly nicer cameras and more professional people that had shot out dozens and dozens of Food Network shows before. But in terms of the storytelling, it was very exciting to me because it was like, “Oh, wait, we have kind of been doing this all along.”
It’s going to be on Discovery+, as well as the linear Food Network, and a big part of this strategy for Food Network and Discovery is there’s this merging of digital becoming more and more TV-like and TV becoming more and more open to digital modes of distribution. So I think what really stands out is good content. — Fulmer
The post How the Try Guys took their YouTube channel and turned it into a media company and a TV deal appeared first on Digiday.