Less BS, More Facts, Some Opinions
Mediaocean will be switching private equity portfolios, moving from Vista Equity to CVC Capital Partners and TA Associates, the company announced on Tuesday. The valuation of Mediaocean or of Vista’s stake was not disclosed, except that CVC and TA are taking on Vista’s equity share. John Nardone, CEO of the Flashtalking ad server that Mediaocean… Continue reading »
The post Mediaocean Switches Private Equity Owners, As It Evolves For An Internet-Delivered Age appeared first on AdExchanger.
“The Sell Sider” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community. Today’s column is written by Mike Chowla, Sr. Director of Product Management, PubMatic. Header bidding is now widespread and successful on the web, and Prebid.js is the most widely used solution. However, the majority of publishers using Prebid are… Continue reading »
The post It’s Time For Publishers To Embrace Server-to-Server appeared first on AdExchanger.
Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here. SPAC’s All Folks Vice Media officially nixed plans to go public via a special purpose acquisition company (SPAC), at least for now, The Information reports. However, Vice did raise an additional $85 million from existing investors. A portion of those funds are earmarked for… Continue reading »
The post Vice Abandons SPAC Plans; Databricks Valued At $38 Billion In Latest Round appeared first on AdExchanger.
Direct-to-consumer drink brand BruMate is doubling down on its SMS-based marketing efforts. The company is doing so in hopes to scale, diversify its media spend, offset the impact of data privacy changes and better retain customers — and it’s a play that other DTC brands are starting to follow.
The Florida-based DTC brand originally started its text message marketing effort in 2019, three years after its launch, as a way to capture email addresses and phone numbers as users sign up to receive marketing communications and promote product launches. But in light of iOS14 cracking down on targeting and rising costs in a saturated social media landscape, BruMate has given SMS marketing a second look, said Kyndal Shewmake, senior director of marketing.
“We’re moving away from being so heavily reliant in our ad spend on paid social,” she said. “The most growth we anticipated this year was through influencer [marketing] and SMS, and that’s where we’ve been investing more.”
At present, BruMate’s SMS efforts take up anywhere from 10-12% of ad budget, up from 5% this time last year, according to Shewmake, who declined to detail dollar amount. The current strategy encompasses product launches and promotion, cart abandonment messages that nudge digital shoppers toward final checkout, and other messaging related to shopper purchases.
It also doubles as a way to get insight into BruMate customer shopping habits to inform marketing strategy and create repeat customers. The most loyal BruMate customers can expect SMS-based communications up to once per week, said Shewmake.
“We’ve been able to turn a lot of that new traffic into customers through a smart strategy for capturing customers [through] text,” she said, noting that return on investment for SMS is higher than any other channel currently employed by the drinkware brands, which sells products such as coolers, tumblers and travel mugs.
With the new direction, SMS marketing has become BruMate’s largest sales channel, even outpacing email, largely contributing to the brand’s reported significant year-over-year online sales growth. While Shewmake declined to offer specifics, she did say SMS efforts made up next to nothing for 2019 online sales versus “now it makes up the most significant share of revenue across all channels.”
According to Shewmake, channels like paid social and email marketing have contributed to driving traffic to the BruMate site, but SMS marketing efforts “have been a key driver converting those sales.”
SMS-based marketing has become a highly sought after marketing channel as advertisers continue to look for new ways to get in front of online shoppers. As digital real estate becomes harder to find at a cost effective price and data privacy measures ramp up, brands like Peace Out Skincare and direct-to-consumer wine brand Usual Wines have already launched SMS efforts.
Ecommerce email marketing and SMS platform Omnisend recently reported that this year, their clients are projected to send more than three times the number of SMS than last year in an effort to start collecting shopper information like mobile phone numbers with the looming threat of iOS14 data privacy changes.
“Everybody has a phone,” said Ryan Brelje, senior product marketing manager at cross-platform marketing platform Iterable. “The audience potential is huge. There’s a ton of reach across the globe. If you’re already sending email and already seeing how [shoppers are] browsing, it might make sense to integrate SMS as a specific touch point to bridge those continuity gaps.”
However, it’s not a replacement for email marketing, warns Duane Brown, founder of performance marketing shop Take Some Risk, noting that text message-based marketing offers limited real estate in comparison to an email and tends to be more informal.
“We use SMS as a different channel than email but it also compliments what you are doing on email,” Brown said. “You should give your customers the option and let them use the channel they prefer to communicate with you.”
Ahead of Q4 and the holiday shopping season, advertisers are on the hunt for new marketing channels. And per Brown, SMS can serve as a supplement to an advertiser’s media mix, but he warns advertisers to tread carefully. “If someone has given you their email or phone number to communicate with them. Don’t blow it and spam them,” he said.
The post ‘The audience potential is huge’: Why DTC drink ware brand BruMate is taking a second look at SMS marketing appeared first on Digiday.
The Future of TV Briefing this week looks at the companies that are aiming to revamp the traditional TV ad format for streaming.
The key hits:
TV’s age-old 15- and 30-second spots sufficed for eons. But the streaming era — and particularly the popularity of ad-free outlets like Netflix — has introduced some urgency for the TV and streaming advertising industry to uncover ad formats that audiences will be more willing to sit through.
“Running a ton of ads is a terrible viewing experience on TV. How can we create a better viewing experience, which might make ads more impactful?” said one agency executive.
There is no easy answer to that question. But options are emerging, and they largely split between improving upon the traditional TV ad break and breaking it. In addition to TV networks and streaming services subtracting the amount of ads they air each hour, companies like Origin Media are endeavoring to ease the standard commercial interruptions. Meanwhile, others like BEN, Mirriad and TripleLift have developed ways to insert advertisers into programs without stealing or subverting the show.
For years, TV networks have been inserting show snippets in commercial breaks in order to get people to stop fast-forwarding through the ads. Similarly, product placement has long been a way for producers to acquire props for no cost or even a profit. But streaming is enabling companies to automate these alternative ad approaches in ways that can make them more targetable and measurable and, importantly, less manual. And considering the tightness of the traditional TV and top-tier streaming ad market, not only are advertisers pressed to find alternative means of reaching audiences, but even TV networks are taking in-show brand integrations more seriously.
“What we’re seeing is that integration teams or branded content teams within linear networks are starting to have a revenue number they need to hit separate from the ad sales team,” said Erin Schmidt, chief product placement officer at BEN. “The industry is shifting. There are more opportunities to finance content and not be restricted to the 30-second spot because inventory is more limited.”
Take the updated approach to product placement, for example.
In the past, advertisers would have to send physical goods to a show’s set in order to appear in a program. But now companies such as TripleLift are able to use technology like computer vision — a form of artificial intelligence that is able to understand the contents of an image, such as a frame of video — in order to automate the whole undertaking.
TripleLift’s technology is able to “find surfaces in the background that track frame by frame, so we know we can do an insertion at scale, and consumers won’t be able to notice,” said Michael Shields, gm of advanced advertising at TripleLift, which has worked with advertisers like Nissan.
But it’s not only the creation of product placements that is undergoing an overhaul. So is the delivery. Companies are plugging into video ad servers in order to distribute these product placements as if they were a standard mid-roll ad. TripleLift is already able to do so via server-side ad tech, such as Adobe’s Primetime and Amagi. And within the next 12 to 18 months, Mirriad expects to have rolled out a deal with an undisclosed video ad server that will enable the company to dynamically insert brands and products into shows.
“We’re looking at the video ad server as ultimately the distribution device that allows me to push whatever piece of content I have into any kind of destination,” Stephan Berringer, CEO of Mirriad, which has run campaigns for roughly 150 advertisers with campaign budgets ranging between $600,000 and $700,000.
Similar to a standard display or video ad call, an ad request will go out to fill a product placement spot in a show, then a modified version of the scene will be slotted into the stream, and the ability to do so dynamically means that the modified scene can be tailored to specific audience segments.
But these bells and whistles are only beneficial insofar as an advertiser is able to gauge an impact on their business. So companies have also been making progress on the measurement front by working with firms like Kantar and MediaScience to measure performance. Mirriad, for example, has worked with Kantar to conduct studies that showed people exposed to a Mirriad product placement were aware of a brand versus 47% for those who were not exposed to Mirriad’s placements. Meanwhile, MediaScience measured a 32 percentage point increase in unaided brand awareness for TripleLift’s in-show integrations.
That’s all well and good. But this is still TV we’re talking about, and for now — for better or worse — TV (and even CTV) remains the domain of the interruptive ad break. It’s what advertisers are most familiar with and what guarantees them 100% of people’s attention on screen. Of course, that assumes an advertiser has a person’s attention in the first place, which is where Origin Media saw an opportunity to revamp the legacy ad placement.
“We said, ‘Ad breaks exist. They are moments in time that are already there.’ What we’re going to do is we’re going to challenge why they should only run ads,” said Freddie Godfrey, co-founder and CEO of Origin Media. So the company is augmenting the standard ad with what Godfrey described as “native content” but may be better characterized as a warm-up ad.
Origin’s “topper” format is a typically 15-second animated clip produced by the firm’s animation studio that airs before the actual ad and is designed to get the audience’s attention and put them in whatever mindset would best suit the ad. For example, a topper attached to an insurance company’s ad may tease people with information about the average person’s life expectancy. And because Origin is concentrated on CTV and can take advantage of streaming’s targeting capabilities, the topper can be tailored to specific audience segments to reflect life expectancy rates for a viewer’s own region.
Admittedly, improving upon the traditional TV ad by adding more ad seems counterintuitive at a time when streaming services are limiting their ad loads and ad-free streamers like Netflix and Disney+ dominate audiences’ attentions. But Origin conducts studies to measure the effectiveness of its ad additions. In the first quarter of 2021, a big-box retailer ran a campaign that included a topper and judged that Origin’s format led to 1,700 in-store visits, Godfrey said.
However, for all the work being done to advance beyond the traditional TV ad format, companies may face an uphill climb in convincing advertisers to invest in alternatives to their long-held 15- and 30-second spots — the fossil fuel of the advertising industry.
Albert Thompson, managing director of digital innovation at Walton Isaacson, questioned whether there was enough urgency among TV advertisers to wean themselves off the traditional ways of doing business and cited the upfront’s survival as an example.
“No one took the time to say, ‘Should we really be running the same spot in every pipe?’” Thompson said.
“We’re kind of being nudged to almost think about a post-upfront upfront.”
— Exverus Media president Bill Durrant on TV’s scatter ad market
The college football season officially kicked off on Aug. 28, and now the question is whether it will proceed as planned, as the delta variant surge spreads.
While the NFL accounts for the biggest single slice of TV viewership, college football attracts hundreds of thousands to millions of viewers per game. Last year the absence of many college football games last year — with schedules shortened and games canceled because of the pandemic — likely contributed to the TV ad market further tightening. By contrast, the status of this year’s college football calendar will play a role in how the TV ad market plays out in the fourth quarter.
For their part, agency executives believe that the NCAA and the respective collegiate athletic conferences will do whatever they can to preserve the season. “There will be no Big Ten holdout again. They lost so much money [after canceling and eventually playing an abbreviated schedule last year,]” said one agency executive.
However, while agency executives are confident that college football games will be played as scheduled, they are less sure of whether the delta variant will eventually lead to limits on in-person attendance and, in turn, dilute the TV viewing experience and depress viewership numbers.
“My biggest concern still is that the season will go on in tact, but will there be fans?” said a second agency executive. They added, “Time will tell about the success of college football, specifically because fans are such an integral part of that success.”
The first agency executive recalled a conversation they had last year with an executive at a TV network that airs college football. “He was like, ‘NCAA is driven by in-stadium [revenue]. NFL is driven by TV rights. If in-stadium [attendance] is down for NCAA, it kills them. That’s one of the reason I think they will come back with fans, and I do think NCAA viewership will go up,” said this agency executive.
$20 million: How much money a connected TV ad fraud scheme is estimated to have cost advertisers per month.
216 million: How many people are projected to tune into free, ad-supported streaming TV services each month in 2023.
43%: Percentage share of national advertisers’ U.S. ad dollars that went to TV in the first half of 2021
$1.2 billion: How much money political advertisers are expected to spend on streaming video ads during the 2022 midterm election cycle.
TV’s scatter advertisers apply upfront-style approaches heading into the fourth quarter:
Read more about TV’s scatter advertisers here.
Vice reshuffles its ranks to prioritize publishing fewer words, more vertical video:
Read more about Vice here.
The esports events every marketer should know:
Read more about esports here.
Advertisers aren’t sure about NBCUniversal’s measurement move:
After NBCUniversal called for the TV ad industry to move beyond relying on Nielsen’s measurement system, advertisers including Anheuser-Busch InBev and Procter & Gamble have questioned following the media conglomerate’s lead, according to Insider. The bone the advertisers are picking is that, while Nielsen’s measurements are empirically imperfect, they are at least impartial.
The NFL will be a bellwether for TV’s return:
This year’s NFL season will signal whether TV networks and Amazon made a smart by ponying up $105 billion in the latest rights negotiations, according to Bloomberg. NFL games are the most prized programming on TV, so how viewership compares to last season — and how that comparison stacks up against broader TV viewership trends — will provide a temperature check for the overall industry.
Hulu’s programming library is at risk of shrinking:
Hulu’s programming library may soon suffer from the streaming wars, according to Variety. Next year, NBCUniversal will gain the option to pull some of its shows from the Disney-owned streamer, and other networks like Fox and ViacomCBS could follow suit.
Hollywood’s production return burns out crews:
As the entertainment industry has returned to in-person production, crew members have swung from being out of work to being burnt out on work, according to Los Angeles Times. A pile-up of projects and the pressure to make up for lost time is leading to longer work hours and shorter periods in between.
The post Future of TV Briefing: How companies are working to move beyond the traditional TV ad format appeared first on Digiday.
Even with many employers’ (and employees’) fall plans in flux, one thing is clear: The five-day office workweek is dead in the media industry, according to new Digiday+ research.
In July, Digiday surveyed 120 professionals working at publishers. Roughly a third, or 38 of the respondents worked for small publishers (defined, in this case, as having annual revenues up to $10 million), 39 worked for medium-sized ones (annual revenues between $10 million and $50 million) and the rest worked at large publishers (annual revenues higher than $50 million).
While significant percentages of publishers still haven’t told their employees anything concrete about their companies’ return to work strategy, a very small percentage of those that have heard plans will be expected to go back to their desks five days per week. Just 3% of the survey’s respondents said that was their plan.
By comparison, 20% of respondents said that they can work from home permanently, a percentage that has doubled from where it was in April. Back in the spring, Digiday polled 105 publisher professionals using the same questions. Between April and July, the percentage of publishers who hadn’t told their workers anything concrete about return to office work halved.
On the whole, less than half of the respondents had firm plans for how many days per week they’d be in the office. Only a slight majority of large publishers have firm expectations for how many days they’ll be in the office, while just one third of the respondents from smaller publishers have clear ideas of how many days they’ll be at work in person.
By now, many media workers likely view these plans as being written in pencil. As the delta variant of COVID-19 has ripped across the U.S., a number of media companies, from Politico to The Washington Post to ViacomCBS, have either pushed back their office return dates or paused their return plans indefinitely. A similar thing is happening among agencies, which are being forced to adopt more flexible approaches as employees continue to take precautions to protect themselves and their families.
The post Digiday Research: The five-day in-person office workweek is dead appeared first on Digiday.
Back in the 2010s, protecting one’s privacy on the internet seemed like a priority for the tin foil hat set. This fall, some of the biggest tech companies in the world will be trying to push the concept further into the mainstream.
In September, Apple will launch Apple Private Relay, a paid service that, for $4.99 per month, will prevent websites (and the trackers loaded onto their pages) from identifying who is viewing them; Neeva, a private, subscriber-supported search engine that does not allow any ads, will begin hunting for customers armed with $40 million it raised in a recent series B funding round; Firefox, which has nearly 200 million monthly active users, will continue to educate its user base about two privacy-focused consumer products of its own, including a VPN and a private relay product that emerged from beta at the end of last year.
These companies’ approaches to privacy differ, but they are all betting on the same thing: that a significant chunk of consumers — after years of reading about personal data hacks, irresponsible data sharing and surveillance capitalism — will decide to simply reject the tracking methods and systems that underpin modern digital advertising.
How big that chunk will be may be hard to guess. While digital privacy is discussed more now than it has been in the past, its stakes remain obscure to a significant percentage of internet users. But the simple fact that so many companies are placing these kinds of bets should give marketers pause as they move forward with their plans for life after third-party cookies.
“We’re seeing a change in the tech industry primarily because users have seen how these same companies have abused their data,” Al Smith, a fundraising director at the Tor Project, wrote in an email. The Tor Project, which boasts privacy online by encrypting traffic, is in the first year of a multi-year project to improve its browser’s speed and scalability. “Ultimately, we are happy to see the Tor Project’s vision and goals (and in some cases, the technology we originally developed) seeing wider adoption, but there is still a long way to go.”
While privacy-centric software has existed for years, it has been adopted mostly on the fringes of society. Stats published by the Tor Project suggest its user base has hovered around 2 million daily active users, worldwide, for the past four years. Downloads of the three most popular VPN apps — Norton, Super Unlimited Proxy and CyberGhost — are slightly more robust, but still imply that private browsing is an emerging user behavior: All three apps, combined, have been downloaded 13 million times over the previous year, according to Sensortower data.
And for private browsing to become more established, a critical mass of consumers needs to think they have a problem that needs solving. Up until quite recently, Americans weren’t there yet. Separate studies conducted in 2019 by the Pew Research Center found that small percentages of American consumers, less than 15%, were actively taking steps to preserve their online privacy, and barely half were letting privacy concerns dictate their use of different services: 52% of respondents said they’d decided against using a product or service out of concerns over how much personal information would be collected about them.
“It’s not intuitive to users what we’re doing and what we’re protecting against,” said Marshall Erwin, Mozilla’s chief security officer. “The immediate effort has focused on figuring out how we can take the product offering, as is, and communicate it clearly to consumers.”
Privacy proponents will say, however, that there is momentum gathering behind that effort. The Brave browser, for example, which blocks all advertising and allows users to browse anonymously using Tor, has amassed a small user base of about 9 million daily users since it first launched in late 2019. It is also growing quickly: The startup announced back in February that its base of both daily and monthly users had more than doubled.
Even with the wind at their backs, large-scale change will likely take a while. Sridhar Ramaswamy, who led Google’s ad business before he left to found Neeva, said he believes Neeva can get to 200 million subscribers, each paying, at minimum, $4 per month (Ramaswamy is hopeful that enterprise-level business customers, which typically generate far more revenue per user, will be part of Neeva’s future over the long term).
He also believes that will take a while. Just a few weeks out of beta, Neeva’s app was downloaded a little over 2,000 times by the end of August, according to Sensortower. It’s not clear how many converted into customers. “The process of building up to the kind of subscriber base that Netflix has is a 10-plus year project,” Ramaswamy said. Unlike the network effects that can make a hot new app or social network take off across the internet, Ramaswamy said, “Trialers are won, one at a time.”
And as Neeva, Apple, Firefox, Tor and others win those converts, marketers must grapple with the consequences. While past ad-disrupting technologies like the DVR didn’t wind up delivering the mortal blow many feared, they have had a cumulative effect, and this crop of privacy products will add to it. “The capacity of advertising to reach every consumer the way it used to is diminished,” said Brian Wieser, president of business intelligence at GroupM.
Marketers have plenty of places besides the internet to put themselves in front of consumers. But between private browsing, the self-contained ad ecosystems being built by the likes of Google, Facebook, Amazon, Walmart and others, the media ecosystem is speeding back toward a much more atomized place, as well as the moves being made to fix it. A contextual targeting renaissance taking place not just on the open web but within large ecosystems like Google’s suggests that advertisers may try to move away from identity-based targeting and more toward a system of triangulation based on context or other more freely available signals.
“You turn something that’s scarce and strategic into something plentiful and specific,” Wieser said. “If your spots and dots become scarcer, the answer is to decouple the attributes.”
The post This fall, tech companies will try to push private browsing into the mainstream appeared first on Digiday.