‘They’re primed’: DuckDuckGo wants to be ‘the easy button’ for privacy on the internet. Do internet users want one?

This story is part of Digiday’s Masters of Uncertainty series, a look at people and companies at the center of media’s defining storylines. Find the rest here.

DuckDuckGo founder and CEO Gabriel Weinberg has a track record of getting to the next big thing early.

Maybe too early.

In 2006, back when Facebook was a college curiosity that still hadn’t moved off campuses, Weinberg, a graduate of MIT, sold The Names Database, a kind of proto-social network whose tagline was “Making the World a Smaller place,” to Classmates.com for $10 million.

Weinberg used some of that money to bootstrap his current venture, DuckDuckGo, a privacy-focused technology company which, after years of focusing on its search engine, started expanding beyond its core product last year. Instead of just being a privacy-first search engine or browser, Weinberg wants DuckDuckGo to become what Weinberg calls “the easy button” for privacy on the internet.

In July, it launched a beta version of Duckmail, a mail-forwarding product designed to give users some anonymity when they sign up for different services online. In November, DuckDuckGo launched a tracker blocker in private beta for Android users, which prevents third-party trackers inside mobile apps from sending data about users’ activity out to sometimes unknown parties.

Those two products are off to modest starts — more than 500,000 people are on Duckmail’s waitlist, and more than 200,000 users are on the waitlist for DuckDuckGo’s tracker blocker. But over time, DuckDuckGo wants to go even further. By Weinberg’s count, there are “about 20” areas of modern life that could be wrapped in a layer of privacy-enhancing technology, ranging from payments to chat to phone calls. DuckDuckGo won’t move into all of those — “In the aggregate, it’s too much for one company to do,” Weinberg said — but the company sees opportunities to provide that layer of anonymity and peace of mind on several fronts.

“We’re really trying to expand our offering to become more comprehensive,” Weinberg said.

Weinberg and the rest of DuckDuckGo waited a long time for a moment like this one to arrive. But now that it’s here, DuckDuckGo faces an unusual quandary. After years on the periphery, consumer privacy has barged into the center of the media conversation, thanks to intensifying competition between Apple, Google and Facebook, increased government scrutiny and growing consumer awareness. Private browser adoption has begun to perk up, and venture capital has flowed in as well, filling the coffers of both enterprise and consumer-facing startups.

Consumer mindsets have tilted toward privacy up too, but in an uneven way; a study conducted by Cheetah Digital this past spring found that slight majorities of consumers now find digital ad tactics such as retargeting “creepy,” rather than “cool,” but barely one fifth of consumers have switched from one digital service to another because of privacy features. That’s forcing DuckDuckGo to both hurry up AND wait: To keep pace as it builds a suite of services in a newly crowded field, while also waiting for more and more consumers to understand what is going on, and what they can do about it.

“We’re crossing over [into the mainstream], but most people haven’t heard our name,” Weinberg said, who added that he thinks about half the U.S. population could be considered part of DuckDuckGo’s target market. “Different people in that group care about different parts of the experience more. As we offer different things, people may adopt our email first, or tracker blocking first.”

Weinberg launched DuckDuckGo in 2008, a quietly pivotal period in digital media history. Google had recently acquired Doubleclick, one of several deals that began to tilt digital advertising — and, over time, advertising in general — away from contextual targeting in favor of behavioral targeting, which relies on companies hoarding information they gather about private citizens.

The ramifications of that shift are clear today, but they were by no means evident at the time. “People didn’t get it right away,” Weinberg said. “It was a ‘boiling the frog’ kind of thing.”

That awareness gap, Weinberg said, helped shape DuckDuckGo’s focus, particularly when the company eventually decided to seek outside capital.

“When we raised money initially in 2011, it was like, ‘Are we going to be a search company or a privacy company?’” Weinberg recalled. “We said, ‘We’re going to focus on search until we get the features we need to make this an easy choice [for consumers],’” Weinberg said.

Nearly a decade later, that focus has paid off — to a point. DuckDuckGo is now the most downloaded mobile browser in the United States, surpassing not just entrenched competitors such as Firefox but also like-minded newer offerings including Brave and Neeva.

It is likely the third most popular mobile browser in the United States by daily active users, after Chrome and Safari — those browsers, which come preinstalled on hundreds of millions of smartphones, cannot be effectively measured by third-party analytics providers — and it routinely ranks within the top three search results on keywords including “search,” “browser,” and “private browser” in the App Store and on Google Play, according to an analysis of Apptopia data.

DuckDuckGo has also built a sustainable business. It brought in “well over $100 million” in revenue in 2021 — a spokesperson would not provide a more specific figure — and has been profitable since 2014, thanks largely to a simple arrangement: DuckDuckGo takes contextual ad impressions created when users search for things, then offers them to advertisers as a publisher inside Microsoft’s advertising network.

But on the internet, successes are now measured in the billions. And relative to other recent digital success stories, DuckDuckGo remains somewhat niche, both to consumers and to advertisers.

“I think DuckDuckGo and other privacy-safe search engines are going to be something to watch as they establish themselves,” said Mohammed Haque, svp of search at Mediahub. “They’re primed.”

As of now, though, DuckDuckGo’s user base is not differentiated in the minds of most advertisers. While ad buyers can target specific publishers within Microsoft’s ad network, “that’s not a common request,” Haque said, and DuckDuckGo’s users aren’t abundant enough to make it more common.

Weinberg is largely clement about this — being profitable helps. And rather than try to win more advertisers’ wallets, he’d prefer to win consumers’ hearts and minds. To that end, DuckDuckGo has been spending more money on marketing. DuckDuckGo raised $100 million at the end of 2020, partly to cash out earlier investors and partly to beef up its marketing and lobbying efforts. Through the first three quarters of 2021, its traditional ad spending was up more than 80% year over year, to nearly $19 million, according to Kantar. Befitting a privacy-first company, it spent less than $1,000 on Facebook ads, according to data from Facebook Ad Library.

It is also hoping to work behind the scenes, and continue to ramp up pressure on governments to make things less hospitable for companies — read Google — that rely on behavioral targeting.

“My goal would be to help create the market conditions [that bring back contextual targeting],” Weinberg said. “The best way it can happen is through governments allowing an opt-out or opt-in to behavioral advertising.

My guess is that 30-80% will choose contextual… the innovation budget will follow those people.”

The post ‘They’re primed’: DuckDuckGo wants to be ‘the easy button’ for privacy on the internet. Do internet users want one? appeared first on Digiday.

How streaming TV is elevating independent content creators


Navdeep Saini, co-founder and CEO of DistroScale, parent company of DistroTV

Streaming has quickly become the go-to entertainment source, with a myriad of newer subscription services entering the landscape. While options are always a boon to audiences, what remains to be seen is whether the expanding range of content represents a truly diverse array of content and service offerings.

With CTV viewership surging, streaming TV providers have a unique opportunity to pioneer a better entertainment viewing experience for consumers on a global scale. 

The operative challenges accompanying that opportunity include questions such as, how should today’s providers look to add meaningful value? How should streaming TV services navigate this new era of entertainment, capture the magic of premium appointment programming and ensure that all content creators — including independent voices — have the chance to tell their stories?

Streaming services are pivoting toward production studios to increase offerings 

It’s no secret that the pandemic intensified the CTV market surge. The U.S. free ad-supported streaming TV (FAST) market is rising and is set to reach 216 million monthly active users in 2023

In the last few years, there has also been a significant shift toward featuring original or exclusive programming across streaming services, particularly subscription-based ones. The industry has seen this with big platforms like Hulu buying the rights from a cable network to exclusively feature a new Kardashian reality show soon to premiere on the platform. More recently, Netflix reported its “biggest ever” series launch with Squid Game. 

What this boils down to is subscription streaming services are spending big budgets on content and, in effect, are starting to morph into something akin to a modern-day production studio. Take, for instance, Netflix. When the streaming service first started, it featured movies from studio productions plus independent content from partners. Today, Netflix is pursuing more content ownership and production.

This shift is stifling independent content creators. 

Independent content creators thrive on social media, but that medium only addresses short-form offerings. There is a white space of potential open for the independents to have their voices heard on the big screen, whether through a channel, a show, a documentary or a movie — and one way to break through to audiences is with FAST.

FAST services are the way to put independent content creators in front of wide audiences 

FAST platforms are setting out to provide creators with a deep environment of the kind that subscription-based services can only scratch the surface — truly catering to a diverse and globally-minded audience by showcasing exclusive or premium content that caters to viewers’ unique interests. 

Partnering with a FAST platform is a low financial lift for independent content creators who are generally looking to break ground and likely don’t have the support or budget behind them to pursue a production with a subscription-based service. They can help get independents in front of audiences with little to no associated upfront costs.

There is inherent value in committing to the elevation of independent voices. Independent content creators bring with them loyal and engaged followers. Those followers will convert to dedicated viewers and, in time, open up additional revenue opportunities for the streaming TV platforms they watch. 

No one can be entirely sure what the future will be. While film festivals used to be a hub for viewers searching for indie offerings, those are slowly being phased out as the industry moves toward a more virtual approach to entertainment. 

As new streaming services continue to pop onto the scene — some solely dedicated to growing independent content viewership — existing paid and FAST services can seize the moment to feature those voices. Now is the time for independent voices to shine, and streaming providers would be wise to capitalize on this opportunity. Independent creators deserve to share their stories and help people connect with the content distributed across platforms. And the way to do that is with FAST. 

Sponsored By: DistroScale

The post How streaming TV is elevating independent content creators appeared first on Digiday.

Omnicom Spotlights Some of the Top Tech Trends From CES 2022

Between mood-altering wearable devices and metaverse fashion, this year’s pared-down version of the Consumer Electronics Show still managed to feature plenty of the flashy glimpses into the future for which the trade show is famous. At a virtual event hosted in conjunction with the Las Vegas convention, Omnicom broke down what the agency giant saw…

CTV And Mobile App Growth Are Behind 2021’s Sizzling Slate Of M&A

2021 was brought to you by the letters M&A. After a pandemic-induced lull in deal activity in 2020, last year was wall-to-wall consolidation across the media and marketing technology sectors. Total deal-making activity in 2021 was up more than 82% year over year, according to LUMA’s 2021 market report released last week. And you canContinue reading »

The post CTV And Mobile App Growth Are Behind 2021’s Sizzling Slate Of M&A appeared first on AdExchanger.

Seeking Growth, Pernod Ricard Doubles Down on Media

Even prior to the pandemic, which closed bars and canceled festivals, Pernod Ricard was starting to have doubts about event-based marketing. Internal research revealed the French spirits maker behind Kahl?a, Absolut and Jameson wasn’t generating a desired return on investment. A better way to boost sales, it concluded, was to broaden its reach and get…

Meta VP of Global Communications John Pinette Leaves the Company

Meta vice president of global communications John Pinette left the company last Friday. Meghan Bobrowsky of The Wall Street Journal reported that Pinette alerted his colleagues about his departure in an internal post, writing, “Today will be my last day at Meta. I know the team will continue to thrive as you do some of…