The state of retail media

Retail media has experienced an influx of attention this past year as brands and agencies understand the power of this medium. By engaging retail customers with both endemic and non-endemic products, they can grow awareness, drive engagement and capture conversions. And retail media spans many different industries, from travel to financial services and more.

However, challenges still need to be addressed, such as a proliferation of retail media networks and achieving clarity around ROI. 

To accompany the recent State of the Industry report from Digiday and Best Buy Ads, diving into how marketers respond to retail media’s evolution, this new By The Numbers video highlights what our respondents had to say — how they’re grappling with standardized metrics, measurements and insights, adjusting budgets, adopting new technologies and adapting to the evolving retail media landscape. 

Watch this video to see: 

  • The evolving role of retail media within the brand and agency marketing mix
  • The methods teams are using to measure retail media’s effectiveness
  • The challenges brands and agencies face as retail media matures
  • The changes teams are making — and hoping for — to build continued success in the space

Sponsored by Best Buy Ads

This upfronts season, advertisers are leaning on convergent solutions to reach fragmented audiences

Amy Leifer, Chief Advertising Sales Officer, DIRECTV Advertising

For advertisers, it’s the most wonderful time of the year. Upfronts and NewFronts, that is, are much like the holidays — a chance to reflect on what matters most with a solid dose of excitement for the year ahead. 

Amid the innovation and progress in the TV industry — and amid economic challenges — the days and weeks around both events are also an opportunity for advertisers to consider how they can help marketers and brands drive their business forward in a meaningful way.

New entrants are leading to fragmentation — and opportunities — as brands and advertisers work harder to build unduplicated reach. Today’s consumers are oversaturated with content and have more viewing choices than ever. For example, a recent survey from DIRECTV Advertising found that 70% of viewers pay for both live and video-on-demand streaming services, of which they have roughly four VOD streaming services on average.

Convergent advertising solutions, like programmatic and addressable, can provide advertisers with an omnichannel approach to TV buying and help manage reach and exposure. Addressable technology allows for precision audience targeting, the ability to better manage reach and control frequency, and can even be used as a unifying technology across linear and streaming campaigns. 

Prioritizing performance-based offerings gives brands better insight into ad investments

Now more than ever, brands and advertisers are leveraging solutions that make the most significant impact against their business KPIs. In uncertain times, maintaining a marketing presence and prioritizing efficient media channels can make or break a brand’s success when the dust settles. 

Brands and advertisers are making the most of their campaigns by prioritizing efficient spending and investing in solutions that help reach the intended audience without waste, such as addressable advertising. By prioritizing relevance in their advertising and adapting creative messaging to align with how consumers behave today, brands can better measure the impact of their investments and come out on top in the long run. 

TV advertisers need measurement solutions that capture audience behavior

The TV advertising industry is witnessing seismic changes, with measurement as a leading challenge. With Nielsen rolling out Nielsen ONE, plus new alternatives like Comscore, iSpot and VideoAmp taking center stage, there has never been more opportunity — or more confusion — about what measurement vendors to prioritize.

In 2023, advertisers and publishers need to test and learn, staying flexible as the measurement ecosystem matures. As the industry evolves, it’s an ideal time for the buy-side and sell-side to work closely together to ensure that measurement and currencies reflect the ever-changing consumer behaviors.

Marketers are balancing contextual ads and audience targeting to address changing privacy regulations 

As more states implement new privacy regulations and third-party cookies and device IDs are slowly depreciated, advertisers know the impact will be significant. To prepare, they are already honing their new strategies on first-party data and flexible contextual solutions. 

Brands and advertisers can navigate this new world by finding the right balance of contextual and audience-targeted solutions and working with partners who can leverage first-party, privacy-compliant audience data and contextual signals for targeting. They can also use tools like data clean rooms to match first-party data securely without sharing personally identifiable information, which brings critical value in a cookie-less future. 

With the growth of content and services, viewers aren’t necessarily cord-cutting. Instead, they’re cord-stacking to get the content they want whenever they want to watch it. For marketers to maximize potential reach in the current environment, brands need to think about premium TV content holistically and buy convergent solutions. 

For instance, last year, DIRECTV partnered with Yahoo to make linear, addressable inventory available in the Yahoo DSP to provide marketers seamless access to linear and CTV inventory. DIRECTV also worked with Magnite to extend programmatic automation to its STB VOD (Set-Top Box Video On Demand) inventory. With traditional TV and digital video access, marketers can reach the largest audience and set themselves up for success in an increasingly fragmented landscape. 

As consumers seamlessly toggle between traditional and streaming, marketers should follow suit and remember — it’s all TV. 

Sponsored by DIRECTV Advertising

Adweek Podcast: Live From SXSW 2023!

In this special episode, we flashback to March where sustainability editor Kathryn Lundstrom and digital editor Colin Daniels recorded a very special episode of the podcast live from South by Southwest. During the conversation, they give on-the-ground insights and share their experiences from behind-the-scenes at major brand activations and experiential marketing stunts. Adweek’s 2023 Sustainability…

Tennessee, Montana to Enact Comprehensive Consumer Privacy Bills

The trend of state-level privacy laws is gaining momentum in the U.S. as Montana and Tennessee became the latest to pass comprehensive legislation. Both bills cleared their state legislatures in April and await their respective governors’ signatures before becoming law. If passed, Montana’s law would become effective on Oct. 1, 2024, followed by Tennessee on…

Amazon grants reprieve to ad tech partners in APS’ ongoing pricing saga

Last month Amazon Publisher Services contacted ad tech companies that help publishers connect to its advertiser-demand tool informing them of a notable price change starting today, May 1.

APS has decided to temporarily waive net bid requirement (per publisher) for a period no later than July 31
The synposis of an April 28 note to SSPs from Amazon Publisher Services.

It was a development that caused considerable confusion and rancor among publishers and the supply-side platforms that connect them to Amazon’s Transparent Ad Marketplace (TAM), prompting an 11th-hour concession from APS.

For now, the differences between Amazon and supply-side platforms have smoothed over how to meet the increase in TAM buyer fees but the next three months will be filled with the complicated task of reaching a more permanent accord.

The uncertainty initially sprung four weeks ago when APS notified SSPs it was switching the billing model for access to its advertiser-demand offering TAM. This involved shifting from a $0.01 CPM charge to a fee of “2.5% of net revenue,” beginning May 1.

According to some APS partners, the proposal would represent a “4-5% increase over the current cost” which most SSPs covered as they deemed the $0.01 CPM charge negligible.

Conflicting communications

From here, leading SSPs, including Index Exchange, Magnite, and PubMatic, began outreach to their publisher partners to communicate this change. And although the wording of each communiqué seen by Digiday differed in precise wording – Index Exchange told Digiday it would offer to cover the price increase for a month – (in aggregate) they proposed passing the fees on to publishers by reducing the monthly payment made to them by 2.5%.  

However, APS subsequently sent publishers seemingly conflicting messages that certain media owners interpreted as an intimation that SSPs reducing their monthly payments to publishers by 2.5% would violate contractual terms with APS. “It is against buyer [SSP] contracts to charge publishers post-auction,” read a note from APS to publishers sent during the early part of the week commencing April 24.

Related Insights


Amazon’s pending price hike stirs debate among media owners

Amazon Publisher Services will increase TAM buyer fees to 2.5% on May 1.

Effectively, this communication stated that APS wants SSPs, or “TAM buyers” as Amazon terms them, to pay the 2.5% fee, and not pass it on to their publisher partners. This series of developments kicked off much handwringing with publisher sources expressing confusion and SSPs balking at the narrow window to implement such a policy change.

Additionally, multiple sources contacted by Digiday interpreted the move as indicative of Amazon’s drive to further drive-up its advertising revenues, which rose 21% year-on-year to hit $9.5 billion last quarter, at the cost of SSPs.

As the May 1 deadline neared, a flurry of conference calls took place between concerned parties with APS eventually proposing a temporary compromise that allows SSPs to implement their initially proposed billing models, that is, provided they have consent from publishers.

“APS has decided to temporarily allow our buyer partners to seek written approval per publisher to bid in gross (and deduct the TAM fee from the monthly publisher payment), thus waiving the net bid requirement in those sole instances for a period through no later than 7/31/23,” reads an email from publishers to SSP partners dated April 28.

“If APS does not receive explicit consent from a given publisher by 5/31/23, you will continue to be bound to pay the given publisher in net for submitted bids for all impressions from 5/1/23 onwards.”

Separate sources told Digiday that SSPs are now entering into talks with Amazon to develop solutions that can deduct the 2.5% fee in a manner that complies with the requirements laid out in their APS contracts.

“This is definitely a case of being stuck between a rock and a hard place for some SSPs,” noted one publisher source to Digiday.

Nielsen Went Back On Its Big Data Promise. Now What?

Nielsen is reverting back to its panel-based C3 and C7 ratings that track average commercial time over three or seven days.

The post Nielsen Went Back On Its Big Data Promise. Now What? appeared first on AdExchanger.

Why Hasn’t SPO Taken Off with Politics and Public Affairs (Yet)?

The 2024 election will break advertising and fundraising records, with the Presidential election, every seat in the House and a razor-thin Senate majority on the line.  Ad Impact, a political

The post Why Hasn’t SPO Taken Off with Politics and Public Affairs (Yet)? appeared first on AdExchanger.