Reexamining The Lookback Window For Mobile Location Data

AdExchanger |

“Data-Driven Thinking” is written by members of the media community and contains fresh ideas on the digital revolution in media. Today’s column is written by James Smith, chief revenue officer at Arrivalist. Today, brands mainly use mobile location data to measure media effectiveness by aligning analysis with a specific campaign flight. They’ll look at startContinue reading »

The post Reexamining The Lookback Window For Mobile Location Data appeared first on AdExchanger.

Powered by WPeMatico

News Publishers: Resist The Perverse Financial Incentives of Content Monetization

AdExchanger |

“The Sell Sider” is a column written by the sell side of the digital media community. Today’s column is written by Michael Weaver, senior vice president of business growth and development at Al Jazeera Media Network. Today we are living through the public costs of having a free press purpose-built to satisfy the short-term financialContinue reading »

The post News Publishers: Resist The Perverse Financial Incentives of Content Monetization appeared first on AdExchanger.

Powered by WPeMatico

Comic: “Do you even lift test, bro?”

AdExchanger |

A weekly comic strip from AdExchanger that highlights the digital advertising ecosystem… AdExchanger: Origins AdExchanger: Crisis In Ad City (Part I) AdExchanger: Crisis In Ad City (Part II) AdExchanger: Enter Malware (Part I) AdExchanger: Enter Malware (Part II) AdExchanger: Enter Malware (Part III) AdExchanger: Enter Malware (The Conclusion) AdExchanger: Angels And Startups AdExchanger: Rumble In Arbitrage PlazaContinue reading »

The post Comic: “Do you even lift test, bro?” appeared first on AdExchanger.

Powered by WPeMatico

Google AMP Drives More Publisher Traffic; New NYT Team Will Activate Data For Brands

AdExchanger |

Here’s today’s AdExchanger.com news round-up… Want it by email? Sign up here. AMPed Up Google is referring a greater share of publishers’ mobile traffic than it once did. Consumers get 18% of their mobile traffic from AMP, up from 16% last year, according to a report from Chartbeat. Meanwhile, traffic from Facebook Instant Articles was downContinue reading »

The post Google AMP Drives More Publisher Traffic; New NYT Team Will Activate Data For Brands appeared first on AdExchanger.

Powered by WPeMatico

On the hunt for subscriber growth, US publications look abroad

As American news publishers get more serious about consumer revenue, more of them have begun looking abroad.

In 2017, The New York Times grew its international digital subscriber base to more than 2.2 million, 14 percent of its total digital subscriber base, from 1.6 million (and 13 percent) the previous year. The Atlantic, just a few months into an effort to expand its audience in Canada and the U.K., saw its international subscription orders more than triple in 2017, and international subscriptions grew from 6 percent of new subscribers to 16 percent. The Washington Post, which has been trying to broaden its base internationally, quadrupled the number of international subscribers it has, and international subscribers now make up just under 10 percent of the Post’s customer base.

Most of the American publishers courting international readers are spending to bolster their editorial coverage of foreign markets. But they are also finding that robust coverage of American affairs, and American perspective, is what’s most important to subscribers in those foreign markets.

“Our global audience is not interested in another local news source,” said Jodi Rudoren, an associate managing editor at The New York Times who oversees its foreign report. “Our signature journalism is the biggest draw.”

The Trump bump that boosted the subscriber bases for many American publishers has played a role in this international growth. In an increasingly global media market, U.S. publishers can use their American perspective as a competitive advantage rather than a detriment. In effect, Trump has made the workings of Washington, in particular, even more top of mind to international audiences, though publishers cautioned that interest in the Donald was not the sole reason for their growth. “I wouldn’t overattribute the success of this to the administration,” said Miki King, vp of marketing at The Washington Post. “Even prior to the 2016 election season, we started to see an uptick in interest.”

At the same time, many publishers are bolstering their coverage in key markets to build local credibility. The Times, the Post, The Atlantic and Bloomberg have all grown editorial operations in certain target markets, including Australia, Canada and the U.K. Last year, The Atlantic assembled its first full-time international editorial staff, based in London.

Those reporters are not expected to outdo the local talent. Instead, they’re expected to produce coverage that adds value as a secondary read on the largest stories in a given market. “We’re never going to out-report Canadians on Canada,” King said. “The idea is to do what we do well, which is offer perspective.”

In some cases, they are supposed to build up readership around habit-forming lifestyle topics as well. The Times, for example, hired a food critic for its Australian bureau, who worked with food editor Sam Sifton to create food and wine packages that were seasonally appropriate for its antipodean readers.

Some of the gains from the past year came from product tweaks made to capture pent-up demand. For example, in the six months since Bloomberg put a paywall in front of Businessweek, international digital subscriptions have increased 71 percent. “The sheer act of saying this is a premium product actually works,” said M. Scott Havens, Bloomberg’s global head of digital.

But to keep subscriber growth going, some publishers think more elaborate changes will help. Though many news publishers have been wary about personalizing their sites too much, the Times’ Rudoren sees geotargeted personalization as a major opportunity.

“Every time we have a signature journalism moment, we get a massive influx of new readers. We’ve started thinking about that as a first date with those people,” she said. “I think we need to start figuring out how to personalize that experience and show them what we have to offer.”

For now, a lot of this work focuses on serving English speakers living abroad. But the Times and Bloomberg are planning to expand into different languages, albeit in different ways. Businessweek, which already publishes foreign editions in Mexico, the Middle East, Indonesia and China, is eyeing licensing partners in South America, central Europe and in the Asia-Pacific region, which will license Businessweek content and translate it.

The Times, which publishes small editions in Chinese and Spanish — around a dozen pieces per site, per day — is about to launch a collection of stories in French.

Almost all of this activity is focused on selling digital subscriptions. Though they have their share of problems — extra local taxes and duties, substantial delays between when a customer pays and when they can access the content — shifting to a digital-only product has made all this possible. “From a cost perspective, it doesn’t make a ton of sense to promote international home delivery,” King said. “The business model makes much more sense on the digital side.”

External pressure from the advertising market plays a role in this new interest as well. “It used to be that the advertising was so important that it made no sense to try and get international circulation,” said Ava Seave, a principal at media consultancy Quantum Media. “Now that advertising is so much smaller, the circulation revenue becomes more important.”

The post On the hunt for subscriber growth, US publications look abroad appeared first on Digiday.

Powered by WPeMatico

Digiday Research poll: 8 in 10 don’t think Facebook Watch will challenge YouTube

In February 2017, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg boldly declared, “I see video as a megatrend. That’s why I’m going to keep putting video first across our family of apps.”

Facebook Watch launched in August 2017 with 30 content partners, and Facebook was reportedly willing to spend as much as $1 billion to fund original shows for Watch. Despite the massive investment, the question remains: Will Watch ever challenge YouTube’s dominance in online video? In an online survey of 43 Digiday+ members, about 1 in 5 (21 percent) thought Watch could take on YouTube.

This article is behind the Digiday+ paywall.

The post Digiday Research poll: 8 in 10 don’t think Facebook Watch will challenge YouTube appeared first on Digiday.

Powered by WPeMatico

Inside Vans’ social media strategy

Vans hired its first global executive creative director, Erwin Federizo, in January. The former agency executive is focused on improving Vans’ consistency on social media.

The streetwear brand is on a high, swept up in a flurry of celebrity endorsements, street-style sightings and high-end collaborators, but it’s trying to stay grounded. Federizo, for example, believes the brand’s “social voice needs to strengthen” if it is to venture into emerging markets.

A Brandwatch analysis of Twitter conversations that used one or more of Vans’ handles — @vans_66, @vansskate @vanssurf, @vansbmx66, @vanssnow or @vansgirls — between Feb. 15, 2017 and Feb. 15, 2018 revealed that 74 percent of the mentions came from the U.S. The U.K. was the next biggest market, with 3 percent of shares in the period. Twitter is banned in China, but each of the other three emerging markets Brandwatch tracked — Brazil, Mexico and Indonesia — accounted for 1 percent of shares each.

Federizo said finding ways to grow Vans’ following in emerging markets is at the top of his to-do list.

Asia, specifically China, is the growth opportunity for Vans: Sales in China rose just 9 percent year over year in its most recent quarter versus an 18 percent jump in Europe over the same period. In a market like China, where members of the younger generation are more eager to portray themselves as global citizens, Vans understands its focus on subcultures over the mainstream could be an advantage.

WeChat is Vans’ biggest social network in China and has become a staple in Vans’ marketing for most of the decade Vans has been there. Vans has had great success with publishing content on the app, said Nick Street, vp of global integrated marketing for Vans, whose team has turned photos and editorial features from events in China into magazines within the app. The brand has also bought WeChat Moments ads, which appear in a user’s feed in the app, and experimented with QR codes in the app. Street, who spent three years as Vans’ marketing boss in China, said “it’s a little easier” to gain reach there than in the U.S. and Europe.

Vans sees higher engagement on its livestreamed videos on WeChat versus those posted to other other social networks in other markets, said Street, who was unable to disclose figures by the time this story was published. He did, however, share that around 70 percent of Vans’ content on WeChat comes from its global team and therefore isn’t as localized as the output coming directly from the brand’s marketers there. Maintaining global consistency in a market like China, which has vast cultural differences from Western markets, is key to getting across the core of the brand, said Street, but it shouldn’t be at the expense of local relevancy.

The important thing the global marketing team at Vans must remember, he said, is to keep the curated content linked to the overall themes and identity of the brand. “We’re actually hearing from more followers [in China], asking that they hear more from our local creators and fellow fans in WeChat,” he said.

Less than two months into the role, Federizo described his plans beyond cracking China as “conceptual” rather than concrete. He reports to Jamie Reilly, vp of global creative at Vans, but will oversee the brand’s creative directors, who act as the day-to-day managers in a multidisciplinary team of around 30 in-house creatives. Vans has always worked this way, preferring to come up with its own creative ideas and work with agencies on a project-by-project basis.

Eventually, Federizo wants to make the brand’s products and marketing more customizable, while also developing a retail strategy that pushes stores beyond their product-focused role. The stores have become the face of Vans for many of its customers, said Federizo, who plans to bring immersive experiences around music, art, street culture and sports into those environments.

The post Inside Vans’ social media strategy appeared first on Digiday.

Powered by WPeMatico

‘There’s an awful lot of showmanship’: Confessions of a publishing consultant on Facebook’s news feed changes

Facebook’s announcement about its news-feed changes in January continues to have ripple effects across the media industry. But whether this has a lasting impact on publishers’ strategies is debatable. In the latest installment of our Confessions series, where we trade anonymity for candor, we spoke to a publishing consultant specializing in social media, who advises legacy publishers in Europe. The conversation has been edited and condensed.

What are publishers saying about Facebook’s news-feed changes?
There’s a lot of shock and floundering and not knowing what to do inwardly, while outwardly, there’s a lot of posturing and big statements from publishers saying, “This is our new course of action; this is what we’re going to do.” It’s far too early to know what the path forward is. Of course, this will have an impact — we’re just not sure what.

What’s an example?
Publishers that are pulling their content from Facebook — it’s pointless, [like Brazil’s largest newspaper Folha de S.Paulo]. It’s a knee-jerk, posturing reaction. There’s an awful lot of showmanship right now. Publishers want to scare Facebook because there have been so many different gripes. Pulling content is a symbolic rather than strategic move.

What’s the problem with publishers’ response to the changes?
One major publisher said to me, “So, video is dead now. We should all forget about video because of the changes.” If you’re only making video in order to get Facebook views, then you’re doing something wrong. The smartest publishers are the ones who aren’t 100 percent sure what they are going to do, the ones that will test out 10 different new things over the next few months and see what works.

Are publishers reducing their reliance on Facebook, though?
Publishers are more cautious, but history could repeat itself. Publishers feel like they have to start a Group because Facebook has told them to. If they’re not starting these things to create value for people, they’ll be in a tricky situation down the line when they have staffed it with people, and it’s not something Facebook wants to prioritize. One legacy publisher said to me they would see if Groups make sense, and if it doesn’t, they won’t do it.

What’s the issue with Groups?
Groups are not traffic-driving. They are great if your goal is to increase hyperlocal engagement with readers, but the problem is they are not transferable: Groups don’t replace a page or a video strategy; they are not a one-to-one trade-off. If you lose 10 million views a month but you gain 10,000 comments, is that a net positive or a net negative? How do you communicate that to your higher-ups? Making a one-year detailed social media projection for benchmarking when all this change is happening is difficult, when you don’t even know if these metrics will be relevant in a year’s time.

How can publishers handle that challenge?
There’s a difference between strategy and trends or innovation. A lot of publishers have got very good at following trends and have lost track of their strategy. A publisher like Great Big Story will have an easier time navigating these changes than a generic platform-agnostic, social-only news publisher without a strong brand identity. No one wakes up in the morning and really wants to see one-minute videos on Facebook, but they do want to talk about documentaries, stories with strong characters or things they have learned.

Are publishers kidding themselves when they say the changes will ultimately be beneficial?
There’s a difference between saying, “this isn’t going to affect us” and “this is going to be good for us.” There’s a number of reasons why this will be good for publishers. For instance, having internal pressure to make content for Facebook, now there is a reason to focus on something people care about. Ultimately, anything that forces publishers to make better content will be better for readers and publishers themselves. Publishers have also remembered there’s more than Facebook out there. They are exploring YouTube, Apple News and working search engine optimization.

The post ‘There’s an awful lot of showmanship’: Confessions of a publishing consultant on Facebook’s news feed changes appeared first on Digiday.

Powered by WPeMatico

Vogue and Vice push ahead, awkwardly, with their editorial partnership

Vogue and Vice are gingerly moving ahead with their editorial partnership, even after Vice’s sexual harassment saga has been blown open. The Condé Nast publication finds itself in an awkward spot with its editorial collaboration with Vice, now the subject of one of media’s biggest sexual harassment stories.

The partnership, announced in October, was tentatively named Project Vs. A dedicated team of editors from both companies was to oversee content including photos, videos and articles that would run on a new site over a 100-day period and be promoted by both companies. Condé Nast was leading the ad sales effort, working with Vice. It was supposed to launch early this year.

But then, just before Christmas, The New York Times published an exposé on Vice’s history of bad behavior toward women, which led to the suspension of top executives. Vice has also been hit with a lawsuit alleging pay discrimination against women.

Condé Nast, meanwhile, was confronting its own awkward associations. It ended its longtime relationship with fashion photographer Terry Richardson after allegations of sexual misconduct emerged against him. Condé Nast also ended relationships with star photographers Bruce Weber and Mario Testino after allegations surfaced that they harassed male models, and it created new guidelines to protect models.

Project Vs is set to launch at the end of February, Digiday has learned. The project has an advertising sponsor, although its name hasn’t been announced. One concept being worked on for launch week is a short doc called “Model Citizens” about young models from places like South Sudan who are trying to break into fashion but whose futures are now in peril due to legal and immigration changes.

Vogue provided a statement that read: “Vogue feels optimistic about Vice’s significant commitments to a respectful, inclusive and equal workplace and are encouraged by the collaborative efforts their editorial team has shown during the past several months. We look forward to sharing the content we’ve created together in the coming weeks.”

Vice also issued a statement: “This is a unique opportunity where Vice and Vogue are coming together under the shared mission of offering our audiences a new platform to consume genre-bending content — from short films and multimedia collages to photo stories and essays featuring today’s leading talent.”

Lots of media companies have sought to partner with Vice, resulting in content partnerships including HBO in 2015, the Guardian in 2016 and Airbnb in 2017. News that the legacy fashion glossy and edgy news startup would team up initially caused surprise because of the contrast between the two brands. But in light of #MeToo, the partnership drew special attention because Vogue, like other women’s magazines, is reckoning with the subject of sexual harassment by its own editorial staffers.

Vice has committed to a series of reforms, including a pay-parity audit, gender balance in staffing and a board to ensure workplace diversity, pledges that Vogue will no doubt watch closely to make sure it follows through.

The post Vogue and Vice push ahead, awkwardly, with their editorial partnership appeared first on Digiday.

Powered by WPeMatico

Oreo hopes to see ‘Pokemon Go’ success in its own scavenger hunt AR game

More brands are developing their own augmented reality experiences, as the expense and technical ability needed to produce them have decreased and the desire for mobile entertainment has grown. Oreo is the latest, building its own mobile gaming app called “The Great Oreo Cookie Quest,” which engages users with a virtual scavenger hunt.

Oreo’s game gives users clues to find virtual Oreos in the world around them. Using object-recognition technology, the app can detect whether an object is correct and reveal hidden Oreos. For example, a daily clue like, “What puts hands on your wrist?” will prompt users to scan their watch, revealing an Oreo on their phone’s screen. Each virtual cookie is assigned a point value based on how difficult the clue is, and in a leaderboard, users can see how they compare to their friends on Facebook or Twitter, as well as users around the world. Users can scan real Oreos to enter a sweepstakes to win a trip to either Google’s headquarters in California or a trip to Africa.

“The Great Oreo Cookie Quest” involves Oreo’s partnership with Google, which began in August 2016. Prizes are randomly attached to virtual Oreos, and many are Google-related. For instance, users can win Google Play points or Pixel phones. In Europe and Latin America, the game connects even more with Google. There, the game will be promoted with an image of the Google Android robot.

The game is similar to that of “Pokemon Go,” which launched in 2016 and was one of the first popular AR games, where users search for virtual Pokemon in their surroundings. Users can even store their Oreos in their “Cookiedex,” like the Pokedex in “Pokemon Go.”

“We learned a lot from looking at cases like ‘Pokemon Go’ in terms of best practices for keeping players engaged, sharing with friends and building a groundswell movement about it,” said Justin Parnell, director of brand marketing at Oreo.

The Martin Agency created the game, which took six months to produce. It launched on iOS and Android at the end of January in the U.K. and will roll out across Europe, Russia, Latin America and perhaps the U.S. depending on its performance.

“We wanted to create a proprietary property that allowed us to do exactly what we wanted with regards to object recognition, in an environment that was 100 percent Oreo,” said Andrew Watson, vp and creative director at The Martin Agency. To promote the game, The Martin Agency is rolling out one spot for TV and four for social.

While it’s Oreo’s first social AR game, it’s not the first time the brand has used object-recognition technology. In February 2017, Oreo worked with Google on the Oreo Dunk Challenge app. Users scanned Oreos in the app and then, with the help of Google Earth, launched them into the stratosphere before dunking them into a glass of milk in different locations around the world.

“People are spending more time on mobile than any other device, and they are using it more and more for entertainment,” said Parnell.

The post Oreo hopes to see ‘Pokemon Go’ success in its own scavenger hunt AR game appeared first on Digiday.

Powered by WPeMatico