More than a fifth of UK brands plan to decrease their programmatic ad spend

Over one fifth (22%) of brands have said that they plan to decrease their programmatic advertising spend because of concerns over costs or performance, while 41% of advertisers admitted they have lost trust in programmatic advertising as a result of ad fraud according to QueryClick’s latest report titled ‘Programmatic Ad Fraud Transparency’.

QueryClick surveyed 150 heads of marketing, e-commerce and digital at major UK brands with revenue of over £100m, and found that only 40% of major advertisers believed that more than half of their adverts placed online in the last 12 months had been seen by people, while just 7% said they thought the proportion viewed by humans rather than bots was 80% or more.

 

As a result, brands admitted to planning to decrease their programmatic ad spend with just under half (46%) having said they blamed the lack of alternative technology options (alternative ad buying platforms or DSPs) in the market, 41% blamed a lack of transparency over how much the programmatic ads costs, and 39% said that it was due to a lack of transparency over which sites their ads would be placed

The report also revealed that brand safety continued to be a major fear with more than three quarters (80%) of online ad buyers were worried that their current programmatic processes would lead to their adverts appearing next to terrorist or extremist content. 

Another report by the Association of National Advertisers (ANA) revealed that 35% of brands had expanded their in-house programmatic media buying capabilities as marketers show greater demands for more data transparency.

 

QueryClick’s managing director Chris Liversidge explained: “Despite it being on the rise, programmatic advertising is wide open to abuse. Recent studies have put the cost of digital advertising fraud as high as $31bn That makes digital ad fraud not just more costly than any form of cybercrime, but more costly than offline crimes such as counterfeit goods and payment card fraud.

 

“Publishers are on the front line in the battle against advertising fraud. They have a duty to educate both brands and agencies on programmatic processes to ensure transparency. However, brands can take steps to protect themselves too. First, where possible, they should separate their programmatic campaigns so they are given the consideration – and performance measures – their growing size warrants. Secondly, they should unbundle their agency relationship from the programmatic platform, to enable them to seek out independent providers that offer true transparency and protection from the risks of current programmatic campaigns. 

 

“In doing so they will not only significantly reduce their exposure to waste and damage to their band reputation from fraud, but also start to see programmatic begin to deliver on its promise.” 

 

Ad fraud remains biggest challenge for mobile marketers in China and India. Meanwhile, Facebook, Google and News UK have pledged to reduce ad fraud with IAB ‘Gold Standard’ initiative.

Meanwhile, in November, Adform released a report having claimed to have discovered the largest bot network which it christened Hythbot, and was found to be targetting over 1 million URLs.  Procter & Gamble chief marketing officer, Marc Pritchard also called on the industry to clean up its act on a few occassions throughout 2017; 

“We accepted multiple viewability metrics, publishers reporting with no verification, outdated agency contracts and fraud threats with the somewhat delusional thought that digital is different and that we were getting ahead of the digital curve. We’ve come to our senses and realised there is no sustainable advantage in a complicated, non-transparent, inefficient and fraudulent media supply chain,” he stated while speaking at the IAB’s Annual Leadership meeting in Florida which generated headlines. 

Speaking at The Drum’s recent Programmatic Punch conference in London about the need for brands to take their digital advertising capabilities in-house to better protect themselves from ad fraud and hold onto more first party data, was Lara Izlan, AutoTrader, director of commercial platforms and operations, James Burgess, head of programmatic for Unibet Group, Nick Reid, the global head of agency partnerships for Adobe, Greg Carroll, King, director of programmatic advertising and Charlie Glyn, head of Affiperf UK. 

[Read More …]

More than a fifth of UK brands plan to decrease their programmatic ad spend

Over one fifth (22%) of brands have said that they plan to decrease their programmatic advertising spend because of concerns over costs or performance, while 41% of advertisers admitted they have lost trust in programmatic advertising as a result of ad fraud according to QueryClick’s latest report titled ‘Programmatic Ad Fraud Transparency’.

QueryClick surveyed 150 heads of marketing, e-commerce and digital at major UK brands with revenue of over £100m, and found that only 40% of major advertisers believed that more than half of their adverts placed online in the last 12 months had been seen by people, while just 7% said they thought the proportion viewed by humans rather than bots was 80% or more.

 

As a result, brands admitted to planning to decrease their programmatic ad spend with just under half (46%) having said they blamed the lack of alternative technology options (alternative ad buying platforms or DSPs) in the market, 41% blamed a lack of transparency over how much the programmatic ads costs, and 39% said that it was due to a lack of transparency over which sites their ads would be placed

The report also revealed that brand safety continued to be a major fear with more than three quarters (80%) of online ad buyers were worried that their current programmatic processes would lead to their adverts appearing next to terrorist or extremist content. 

Another report by the Association of National Advertisers (ANA) revealed that 35% of brands had expanded their in-house programmatic media buying capabilities as marketers show greater demands for more data transparency.

 

QueryClick’s managing director Chris Liversidge explained: “Despite it being on the rise, programmatic advertising is wide open to abuse. Recent studies have put the cost of digital advertising fraud as high as $31bn That makes digital ad fraud not just more costly than any form of cybercrime, but more costly than offline crimes such as counterfeit goods and payment card fraud.

 

“Publishers are on the front line in the battle against advertising fraud. They have a duty to educate both brands and agencies on programmatic processes to ensure transparency. However, brands can take steps to protect themselves too. First, where possible, they should separate their programmatic campaigns so they are given the consideration – and performance measures – their growing size warrants. Secondly, they should unbundle their agency relationship from the programmatic platform, to enable them to seek out independent providers that offer true transparency and protection from the risks of current programmatic campaigns. 

 

“In doing so they will not only significantly reduce their exposure to waste and damage to their band reputation from fraud, but also start to see programmatic begin to deliver on its promise.” 

 

Ad fraud remains biggest challenge for mobile marketers in China and India. Meanwhile, Facebook, Google and News UK have pledged to reduce ad fraud with IAB ‘Gold Standard’ initiative.

Meanwhile, in November, Adform released a report having claimed to have discovered the largest bot network which it christened Hythbot, and was found to be targetting over 1 million URLs.  Procter & Gamble chief marketing officer, Marc Pritchard also called on the industry to clean up its act on a few occassions throughout 2017; 

“We accepted multiple viewability metrics, publishers reporting with no verification, outdated agency contracts and fraud threats with the somewhat delusional thought that digital is different and that we were getting ahead of the digital curve. We’ve come to our senses and realised there is no sustainable advantage in a complicated, non-transparent, inefficient and fraudulent media supply chain,” he stated while speaking at the IAB’s Annual Leadership meeting in Florida which generated headlines. 

Speaking at The Drum’s recent Programmatic Punch conference in London about the need for brands to take their digital advertising capabilities in-house to better protect themselves from ad fraud and hold onto more first party data, was Lara Izlan, AutoTrader, director of commercial platforms and operations, James Burgess, head of programmatic for Unibet Group, Nick Reid, the global head of agency partnerships for Adobe, Greg Carroll, King, director of programmatic advertising and Charlie Glyn, head of Affiperf UK. 

[Read More …]

Facebook claims success as it case studies it own involvement in SNP's landslide victory in UK General Election

Facebook has claimed the election victory by the Scottish National Party (SNP) during the UK’s general election in 2015 as a success story of its own. 

The social media giant has posted a case study in its ‘Success Stories’ section on its Facebook Business site.  There it has claimed that the SNP  “used a powerful combination of Facebook’s targeting and engagement tools to mobilise its supporters and achieve an overwhelming victory.”

The SNP used Facebook products including adverts and videos to deliver campaign messages, as well as News Feeds across desktop and mobile. Conversion Tracking was implemented and the Facebook login  and sharing buttons were used on its mobile apps and on a dedicated mini-site for grassroots events across the country, making it easy for people to create and RSVP to events with just one click. 

The page also explained how Custom Audiences were generated from the party’s supporter database, while Lookalike Audiences helped reach other likely supporters. Acxiom Partner Categories were also used to target individual constituencies.

The results on the page stated that 1.24 million people reached in Scotland through the SNP’s Facebook activity and that 416,485 people were reached through content via the Facebook on Election Day alone at a cost of 1p per action. 

The SNP in 2015, together with partner consultants Industrial New Media, used Facebook to deliver its policy platform and create an open conversation between leadership and supporters.

Quoted in the case study was Kirk J. Torrance, a director of Industrial New Media, who stated: “Facebook is whre the action is. Politics today is about building relationships and creating a dialogue with constituents, and the only way to do it consistently and in a scalable way is with Facebook.”

He continued: “I don’t think Scotland would be where it is today in terms of representation if it wasn’t for Facebook and the tools it offers campaigners. Whether it’s building relationships with constituents through content and conversation, placing biased journalism and opposition smears into context and rebutting them, or enthusing prospective voters with direct access—Facebook is now a permanent cylinder in the SNP’s campaigning engine.”

Writing for The Drum earlier this year about Facebook’s influence in aiding the election of President Donald Trump during the last US Presidential Elections, Liberty Marketing’s marketing manager, Paul Hunter said; “What makes Facebook such a powerful advertising tool is the information users willingly (but maybe unknowingly) give away while using it. Most of this becomes available to advertisers in the form of detailed targeting. There is an absolute wealth of targeting options that are available to advertisers.”

[Read More …]

Facebook claims success as it case studies it own involvement in SNP's landslide victory in UK General Election

Facebook has claimed the election victory by the Scottish National Party (SNP) during the UK’s general election in 2015 as a success story of its own. 

The social media giant has posted a case study in its ‘Success Stories’ section on its Facebook Business site.  There it has claimed that the SNP  “used a powerful combination of Facebook’s targeting and engagement tools to mobilise its supporters and achieve an overwhelming victory.”

The SNP used Facebook products including adverts and videos to deliver campaign messages, as well as News Feeds across desktop and mobile. Conversion Tracking was implemented and the Facebook login  and sharing buttons were used on its mobile apps and on a dedicated mini-site for grassroots events across the country, making it easy for people to create and RSVP to events with just one click. 

The page also explained how Custom Audiences were generated from the party’s supporter database, while Lookalike Audiences helped reach other likely supporters. Acxiom Partner Categories were also used to target individual constituencies.

The results on the page stated that 1.24 million people reached in Scotland through the SNP’s Facebook activity and that 416,485 people were reached through content via the Facebook on Election Day alone at a cost of 1p per action. 

The SNP in 2015, together with partner consultants Industrial New Media, used Facebook to deliver its policy platform and create an open conversation between leadership and supporters.

Quoted in the case study was Kirk J. Torrance, a director of Industrial New Media, who stated: “Facebook is whre the action is. Politics today is about building relationships and creating a dialogue with constituents, and the only way to do it consistently and in a scalable way is with Facebook.”

He continued: “I don’t think Scotland would be where it is today in terms of representation if it wasn’t for Facebook and the tools it offers campaigners. Whether it’s building relationships with constituents through content and conversation, placing biased journalism and opposition smears into context and rebutting them, or enthusing prospective voters with direct access—Facebook is now a permanent cylinder in the SNP’s campaigning engine.”

Writing for The Drum earlier this year about Facebook’s influence in aiding the election of President Donald Trump during the last US Presidential Elections, Liberty Marketing’s marketing manager, Paul Hunter said; “What makes Facebook such a powerful advertising tool is the information users willingly (but maybe unknowingly) give away while using it. Most of this becomes available to advertisers in the form of detailed targeting. There is an absolute wealth of targeting options that are available to advertisers.”

[Read More …]

Liberty Mutual Insurance ad becomes the most watched ad of 2017 in US

Liberty Mutual Insurance’s TV commercial – ’24-hour Roadside Assistance’ has became the most watched ad of 2017 in US with 6.6 billion impressions according to iSpot.tv. 

The Liberty Mutual campaign (see above), which had an estimated media spend of $71.5m, according to attention and conversation measurement company, iSpot, achieved the most impressions as a result.

It was followed on the most viewed list by Bounty – Chores for Mom and Dad with 4.6 billion impressions and Cascade – Cuts Through Tough, Baked-On Food with 4.2 billion impressions.

Domino’s – Blood, Sweat and Teardowns ad ranked Fourth with 4.1 billion views followed by State Farm – Jacked Up and Allstate – All Alone on Fifth and Sixth spot with 4 billion and 3.9 billions impressions respectively.

Other ads to make it to the top 10 list are Chevrolet – Most Awarded: Long List, HelloFresh – Tonight We Cook, Ebates – I Love Ebates and  Parodontax – Stop the Journey of Gum Disease.

Meanwhile, Reese’s advert ‘List’ was found to be ‘the stickiest’ ad on TV this year, with a 192 Attention Score off of 204.7 million TV ad impressions, with the ad found to be interrupted 92% fewer than the average for other ads on TV.

The full outline of the most seen TV adverts of 2017, taken from data recorded between 1 January and 15 December) including impressions and estimated spend, can be viewed below:

Liberty Mutual – Middle of the Night

Impressions: 6.6 Billion

Est. Spend: $71.5m

Airings: 40,617

Attention Index: 55

Bounty – Chores for Mom and Dad

Impressions: 4.6 Billion

Est. Spend: $54.9m

Airings:  20,437

Attention Index: 93

Cascade – Cuts Through Tough, Baked-On Food

Impressions: 4.2 Billion

Est. Spend: $35.4m

Airings:  26,519

Attention Index: 85

Domino’s – Blood, Sweat and Teardowns

Impressions: 4.1 Billion

Est. Spend: $79.9m

Airings:  25,895

Attention Index: 99

State Farm – Jacked Up

Impressions: 4 Billion

Est. Spend: $66.2m

Airings:  28,027

Attention Index: 77

Allstate – All Alone

Impressions: 3.9 Billion

Est. Spend: $44.2m

Airings:  27,628

Attention Index: 111

Chevrolet – Most Awarded: Long List

Impressions: 3.8 Billion

Est. Spend: $45.9m

Airings:  11,831

Attention Index: 47

HelloFresh – Tonight We Cook

Impressions: 3.5 Billion

Est. Spend: $29.9m

Airings:  34,051

Attention Index: 140

Ebates – I Love Ebates

Impressions: 3.5 Billion

Est. Spend: $35.5m

Airings:  18,111

Attention Index: 105

Parodontax – Stop the Journey of Gum Disease

Impressions: 3.4 Billion

Est. Spend: $27.9m

Airings:  18,814

Attention Index: 63

 

[Read More …]

Liberty Mutual Insurance ad becomes the most watched ad of 2017 in US

Liberty Mutual Insurance’s TV commercial – ’24-hour Roadside Assistance’ has became the most watched ad of 2017 in US with 6.6 billion impressions according to iSpot.tv. 

The Liberty Mutual campaign (see above), which had an estimated media spend of $71.5m, according to attention and conversation measurement company, iSpot, achieved the most impressions as a result.

It was followed on the most viewed list by Bounty – Chores for Mom and Dad with 4.6 billion impressions and Cascade – Cuts Through Tough, Baked-On Food with 4.2 billion impressions.

Domino’s – Blood, Sweat and Teardowns ad ranked Fourth with 4.1 billion views followed by State Farm – Jacked Up and Allstate – All Alone on Fifth and Sixth spot with 4 billion and 3.9 billions impressions respectively.

Other ads to make it to the top 10 list are Chevrolet – Most Awarded: Long List, HelloFresh – Tonight We Cook, Ebates – I Love Ebates and  Parodontax – Stop the Journey of Gum Disease.

Meanwhile, Reese’s advert ‘List’ was found to be ‘the stickiest’ ad on TV this year, with a 192 Attention Score off of 204.7 million TV ad impressions, with the ad found to be interrupted 92% fewer than the average for other ads on TV.

The full outline of the most seen TV adverts of 2017, taken from data recorded between 1 January and 15 December) including impressions and estimated spend, can be viewed below:

Liberty Mutual – Middle of the Night

Impressions: 6.6 Billion

Est. Spend: $71.5m

Airings: 40,617

Attention Index: 55

Bounty – Chores for Mom and Dad

Impressions: 4.6 Billion

Est. Spend: $54.9m

Airings:  20,437

Attention Index: 93

Cascade – Cuts Through Tough, Baked-On Food

Impressions: 4.2 Billion

Est. Spend: $35.4m

Airings:  26,519

Attention Index: 85

Domino’s – Blood, Sweat and Teardowns

Impressions: 4.1 Billion

Est. Spend: $79.9m

Airings:  25,895

Attention Index: 99

State Farm – Jacked Up

Impressions: 4 Billion

Est. Spend: $66.2m

Airings:  28,027

Attention Index: 77

Allstate – All Alone

Impressions: 3.9 Billion

Est. Spend: $44.2m

Airings:  27,628

Attention Index: 111

Chevrolet – Most Awarded: Long List

Impressions: 3.8 Billion

Est. Spend: $45.9m

Airings:  11,831

Attention Index: 47

HelloFresh – Tonight We Cook

Impressions: 3.5 Billion

Est. Spend: $29.9m

Airings:  34,051

Attention Index: 140

Ebates – I Love Ebates

Impressions: 3.5 Billion

Est. Spend: $35.5m

Airings:  18,111

Attention Index: 105

Parodontax – Stop the Journey of Gum Disease

Impressions: 3.4 Billion

Est. Spend: $27.9m

Airings:  18,814

Attention Index: 63

 

[Read More …]

Here Are the Top 10 Tweets of 2017, Featuring Everyone From Barack Obama to J.K. Rowling

Here Are the Top 10 Tweets of 2017, Featuring Everyone From Barack Obama to J.K. Rowling
What does the 44th president of the United States and a chicken nugget-loving teen have in common? According to social media analytics firm Talkwalker, Barack Obama and Carter Wilkerson had the two most popular tweets of 2017. The former’s was a message of peace and love following the white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Va., while…
[Read More …]

Matthew McConaughey Masters the Universe and the Lincoln Navigator in Powerful New Ad

Matthew McConaughey Masters the Universe and the Lincoln Navigator in Powerful New Ad
Academy Award-winning actor Matthew McConaughey is back in a new ad for Lincoln Motor, where we see the sultry, aloof “cool guy” not only master a car, as he’s done for the past three years in these commercials, but seemingly the universe itself. In the Hudson Rouge-created campaign, “Perfect Rhythm,” the Ford-owned auto brand naturally…
[Read More …]

Matthew McConaughey Masters the Universe and the Lincoln Navigator in Powerful New Ad

Matthew McConaughey Masters the Universe and the Lincoln Navigator in Powerful New Ad
Academy Award-winning actor Matthew McConaughey is back in a new ad for Lincoln Motor, where we see the sultry, aloof “cool guy” not only master a car, as he’s done for the past three years in these commercials, but seemingly the universe itself. In the Hudson Rouge-created campaign, “Perfect Rhythm,” the Ford-owned auto brand naturally…
[Read More …]

The Growing Peril of Index Funds: Too Much Tech

Investors who loaded up on U.S. and Asian stock index funds might be surprised to learn just what they own now: technology stocks—a lot of them.
[Read More …]